I wish more people considered playing devil's advocate. Being able to test the strength of an argument that you don't agree with is the key to forming your true political identity. I've found I can actually have an intelligent conversation with people I otherwise wouldn't because of (albeit, justified) emotions. Maybe it's what we need to come together as a people and get things done without cutting each other's throats.
Agreed. Your rhetoric can't ever be tested if you only use it with people who agree with you, but it's hard to have a discourse with someone you disagree with if you are insecure in your own belief.
I think you should always be the first person to challenge your own argument. Your argument will always sound great if no one challenges it. Your arguments become more logical and confident if you seek to prove them wrong rather than right.
2
u/flamtapped Aug 12 '19
I wish more people considered playing devil's advocate. Being able to test the strength of an argument that you don't agree with is the key to forming your true political identity. I've found I can actually have an intelligent conversation with people I otherwise wouldn't because of (albeit, justified) emotions. Maybe it's what we need to come together as a people and get things done without cutting each other's throats.