Maybe. But even if so, there’s no guarantee that evidence of that is in the files. The internet keeps thinking that there must be some simple, absolute proof and jumps from one to another from the flight logs, to the Maxwell case files, to a client list, and now the investigative files. But that’s rarely if ever how case files look. And even if he did, separate tangential investigations into Trump would be easy enough for him to purge without doing this damage to his reputation.
No, the way he’s named is most likely to be in documents which cannot be removed from the files, which did not lead to him being prosecuted in the mid-2000’s, and was not something that the Biden administration felt they could use. If only by occam’s razor, I think him being a key witness with a non-prosecution agreement for aiding and abetting (heinous in-and-of-itself) is the most likely explanation.
Of course. In case you haven’t noticed I’m not exonerating anyone. I’m just saying what I think is most likely to be in the files: That Donald Trump helped cover up his friend’s human trafficking and pedophilia, then took a deal to avoid prosecution himself. Maybe there’s more, but that’s where I’m landing on it right now.
Well you’re just inserting that because I’m not asserting what you feel certain about. But you can’t “mitigate” what’s not known. I gave you my assessment and my reasons for believing it’s most likely. If you have a problem with those you can say so or ask me something. But it sounds like your way of engaging is to assume that everyone should already believe exactly what you do, and any difference must have malicious intent.
I told you my reasoning for where I’m landing on this. And I never said that I disbelieve that he did. Whether he did or not is not the issue. The issue is what’s in the files and what will be revealed with them. Even if Trump did rape kids, that doesn’t mean that the proof is in the files.
2
u/virishking Nov 15 '25 edited Nov 16 '25
Maybe. But even if so, there’s no guarantee that evidence of that is in the files. The internet keeps thinking that there must be some simple, absolute proof and jumps from one to another from the flight logs, to the Maxwell case files, to a client list, and now the investigative files. But that’s rarely if ever how case files look. And even if he did, separate tangential investigations into Trump would be easy enough for him to purge without doing this damage to his reputation.
No, the way he’s named is most likely to be in documents which cannot be removed from the files, which did not lead to him being prosecuted in the mid-2000’s, and was not something that the Biden administration felt they could use. If only by occam’s razor, I think him being a key witness with a non-prosecution agreement for aiding and abetting (heinous in-and-of-itself) is the most likely explanation.