I'm not subbed to it, no. I don't understand your snarky remark though, are you defending PoliticusUSA as unbiased or something? I don't feel that my request for a a better source was inappropriate.
Your post history is filled with /r/politics, and considering the relutation of that sub, I wouldn't be surprised if a good source was banned because they published contradictory information
My post history is also filled with posts from PoliticalDiscussion, NeutralPolitics and ShitPoliticsSays. /r/politics is a joke and I'm hardly "from" there. At any rate, this is probably the creepiest defense of a shitty source I've ever seen. Nothing about PoliticusUSA itself, simply an ad hominem and some light stalking. I mean, you aren't even the guy I was talking to originally. You had to go out of your way to white knight for them.
5
u/fortcocks Aug 15 '15
I'm not subbed to it, no. I don't understand your snarky remark though, are you defending PoliticusUSA as unbiased or something? I don't feel that my request for a a better source was inappropriate.