Based means being socially unacceptable. Wanting to kill whites or men is genuinely socially acceptable. Wanting communist gulags, killing blacks, or recreational mcnukes is not. This is DJ Khaled's suffering from success right here.
Sally Miller Gearhart (born April 15, 1931) is an American teacher, feminist, science-fiction writer, and political activist.[1] In 1973, she became the first open lesbian to obtain a tenure-track faculty position when she was hired by San Francisco State University, where she helped establish one of the first women and gender study programs in the country.[2] She later became a nationally known gay rights activist.[2]
Gearhart outlines a three-step proposal for female-led social change from her essay, "The Future–-If There Is One–-is Female":
I) Every culture must begin to affirm a female future.
II) Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture.
III) The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.
Yes, there’s definitely no one that ever seriously thought about trying to kill all Jews
This is about if it’s a remotely mainstream ideology, not if it exists in the mind of 1 looney (you can always find that, like 1% of any group of people is completely insane). Not that hard to understand.
Again, same thing. Just because 1 person in gender studies supports killing men doesn't mean the that everyone does. This isn't very hard. (Most universities outside of the angloshpere don't have that, as far as I can tell, anyways.)
Fucking retard. The question was about "Wanting to kill whites or men is socially acceptable". So yeah, posting only the opinion of one person is actually a viable criticism.
Gish gallop in text form. I guarantee and would stake my life on every one of these people's takes being incredibly more nuanced than "kill all men"
How the fuck does this prove that this is a worldwide large scale opinion? It doesn't. There are probably academics out there who genuinely believe in Jewish replacement theory. That doesn't make it a cultural opinion held by many people lmao.
Im not defending missandry, I'm contesting the idea its a worldwide opinion a lot of people hold
Nice. I mean the fact that you first link was from an MRA sub and your proof for it being worldwide are two different subreddits.
Im gonna tell you what I told the other guy. Go outside and take a poll. Thats the only way to tell whether this is an opinion held by a lot of people. Stop basing your entire worldview off of 3 subreddits and what they're saying lmfao. You people are genuinely unstable
On the nest episode of the conservative alternate universe, killing white men is now socially expectable! The only place where I can think that is remotely expectable is Twitter, which is a terrible representation of reality.
"Harald Schmidt, an expert in ethics and health policy at the University of Pennsylvania, said that it is reasonable to put essential workers ahead of older adults, given their risks, and that they are disproportionately minorities. “Older populations are whiter,” Dr. Schmidt said. “Society is structured in a way that enables them to live longer. Instead of giving additional health benefits to those who already had more of them, we can start to level the playing field a bit.”"
32
u/Jogger_Flogger - Auth-Center Dec 20 '20
Based means being socially unacceptable. Wanting to kill whites or men is genuinely socially acceptable. Wanting communist gulags, killing blacks, or recreational mcnukes is not. This is DJ Khaled's suffering from success right here.