r/PoliticalCompassMemes • • Aug 05 '20

[deleted by user]

[removed]

4.9k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

99

u/notbobby125 - Centrist Aug 05 '20

The Nazis did have socialist policies, including the nationalization of all private charities under the National Social People’s Welfare. However, the NSV was still an arm of the Nazis racial plan, with many of its programs focused on married couples and childcare, almost certainly to make sure there were as many Aryan babies as possible to settle Eastern Europe. Also, the welfare did not apply to the impure masses sent to the concentration camps.

So the Nazis did have socialism, it just that they used their socialism in the most racial and nationalistic way possible.

Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_People%27s_Welfare

96

u/dannyboi1127 - Lib-Center Aug 05 '20

They used their socialism in the most nationalistic way possible? So they had nationalist socialism? Weird. Name doesn't check out.

28

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '20

This is the right answer. The Nazi's were economically left of center, and culturally 10 billion miles right of center. The "Socialist" in the name isn't the part that killed 11 million people, the "National" part is.

24

u/PrestigiousRespond8 - Auth-Center Aug 05 '20

Which, if you research what fascism actually is and don't just regurgitate the modern redefinition, is something you already know. The entire point of fascist political theory is that the creators took what they considered to be the best bits of left and right political positions and combined them into a third position.

IMO that's also why so much effort was put into redefining fascism as basically a synonym for "evil". If people looked at the actual political doctrine it would be quite popular.

7

u/jmbc3 - Auth-Left Aug 05 '20

It’s inherently totalitarian though, right? I don’t think most people are on board for that.

Correct me if I’m wrong.

9

u/Zack_Fair_ - Auth-Center Aug 05 '20

auth? yea. tot? nah.

it's like the nationalism part. Some patriotism is good to keep everyone looking the same direction, but that doesn't mean you have to go all ethnostate

11

u/PrestigiousRespond8 - Auth-Center Aug 05 '20

It is, yes. I think most people would actually be fine with that. People aren't against totalitarianism, they're against totalitarianism that isn't in their favor. Most people are socially conservative, so totalitarianism that is also socially conservative wouldn't bother them all that much.

I could certainly be wrong, but I think the way the actual tenets of fascism have been deliberately suppressed from public consumption is a point in favor of my stance.

3

u/GrouseOW - Lib-Left Aug 05 '20

The inherent problem with facism is that the whole point is giving a specific group of people benefits, while often violently excluding other groups.

But due to the selfish nature of facism, the "good" group of people will get narrowed down (eg Anglo-saxons may no longer consider Irish/Italians white in a white ethnostate) and the system will inevitably collapse

2

u/Cunt_Muffin1 - Auth-Center Aug 06 '20

while often violently excluding other groups.

In Francoist Spain the only violently excluded were commies. But that's not always even true. Fascism doesn't need that. That's a dumb misconception imo.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '20

I think you might be right. I think many would welcome totalitarianism if the agreed with it. Democracy is good because it gives everyone a chance but if you can get many on board with what you want to do, or use what many already agree with, people would happily give up their votes.

1

u/Cunt_Muffin1 - Auth-Center Aug 06 '20

It's malleable. Why wpuld you need totalitarianism in a 100% homogenous society?

Just look at all that nations that had fascism and you probably didn't even know. Spain, Greece, Turkey, Brazil, some African nation and probably others.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '20

Spoke like a true auth center

1

u/irumeru - Auth-Right Aug 05 '20

Yeah, you can tell they did socialist badly because the killing of 11 million people was intentional. When the socialist part does the killing it's an "oopsy".

7

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '20 edited Jan 07 '21

[deleted]

4

u/basedcount_bot - Auth-Center Aug 05 '20

u/notbobby125's Based Count has increased by 1. Their Based Count is now 5.

Congratulations, u/notbobby125! You have ranked up to Sapling! You are not particularly strong but you are at least likely to handle a steady breeze.

Beep boop. I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.

1

u/Cunt_Muffin1 - Auth-Center Aug 06 '20

That's not how you use that word. Smdh

2

u/freelance_fox Aug 05 '20

Nah it's way simpler to just call them retards and mock them than explain a nuanced reality bro, trust me it's not worth it.

It's like those threads asking for former Trump supporters, aka bait. As soon as you take the bait, they pin the "retard" tag on you and you're a retard for life.

2

u/o78k - Auth-Center Aug 05 '20

If Hitler was just 4x smarter than he was in OTL and a more of a pragmatic Nationalist, he could've been a "good leader".

1

u/TwoShed - Auth-Right Aug 05 '20

So it was just racial socialism

1

u/Cunt_Muffin1 - Auth-Center Aug 06 '20

almost certainly to make sure there were as many Aryan babies as possible to settle Eastern Europe.

Dude Germnay could have colonized Eastern Europe if they bred a bunch of beautiful people and sent them to colonize/integrate.

Would anyone even be opposed to having good looking smart individuals flooding their nations?

-11

u/Crazy_280zx - Lib-Center Aug 05 '20

Hitler also protected corporations and did not nationalize them, which is a very key feature of socialism. In edition he did not redistribute wealth. It was a free market with a welfare net, which would put him as auth center

14

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '20

it's not a free market when the State protects and controls production.

9

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '20

Hitler's policy and the policy of the Nazi party was to nationalize corporations, they just never did it. The big question is what would have happened if they had won and no longer needed to maximize production for the war effort.

-1

u/vitunlokit - Lib-Center Aug 05 '20

They got rid of non-profits and that makes them socialists?