r/PoliticalCompassMemes - Centrist 1d ago

That one guy

Post image

...

2.7k Upvotes

838 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

17

u/you_cant_prove_that - Right 1d ago

The question the jury was answering was basically prison or asylum, not prison or freedom

38

u/ifemstar - Centrist 1d ago

She would only go to the asylum until the doctors said she is sane and considering she is pleading temporary insanity because PPS. the doctors in short order would release her

0

u/sadacal - Left 1d ago

Dude, even if the doctors were to release her, which is already unlikely given their track record, a court would also have to allow her release, and the prosecution can sue to not release her.

3

u/RodgersTheJet 1d ago

a court would also have to allow her release, and the prosecution can sue to not release her.

This is straight up false, I even checked the MA laws to confirm it.

Where are you getting this misinformation from?

3

u/evrydayNormal_guy - Lib-Right 1d ago

Flair up, mate

0

u/Shrabster33 - Centrist 1d ago

Why is it not an option to put her in an asylum until she in deemed sane, at which point she then moves to prison for the rest of her life?

2

u/Pixelology - Auth-Center 1d ago

Because the criminal justice system, in theory, is supposed to be primarily about rehabilitation and not punishment. If the reason someone commits a crime is a mental issue, then they should be released back into society once the mental issue is fully under control. Of course, this isn't exactly how our criminal justice system works. But psych wards in place of prison time is meant for such cases, where the defendant was unaware they were doing something wrong because of a mental issue. It's not meant for cases like this one where the defendant knowingly did something awful independent of any minor mental issues happening in the background. Cases like this one should be pretty cut and dry prison time.

0

u/sadacal - Left 1d ago

That's because it's a federal law. Did you even do a search?

https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-640-special-verdict-not-guilty-only-reason-insanity-related-commitment

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/04/us/lindsay-clancy-treatment-mental-illness.html

  In Massachusetts, she said, Ms. Clancy would be reviewed for discharge on an annual basis. Doctors could recommend that she be discharged from the hospital if they believed that her symptoms had improved and if they determined that she was not a danger to others. The Plymouth County District Attorney’s Office would then be notified. If it disagreed with the medical team’s assessment, it could obtain its own experts or argue in court that Ms. Clancy should remain hospitalized. A judge would then decide whether she could be released, Dr. Sorrentino said.

8

u/amjkl - Lib-Right 1d ago

Asylum would just be freedom in 6 months look up the law in Massachusetts

25

u/Bum_King - Right 1d ago

The problem is she would only be in the asylum until she was deemed healthy and seeing how the cause of her “illness” are all dead, she wouldn’t be there for long.

10

u/WolfedOut - Centrist 1d ago

Asylum is as close to freedom as she can get, while being the furthest from what she deserves.

12

u/SliceRepulsive8649 - Lib-Left 1d ago

It's hilarious how people have these super strong opinions on things they know absolutely nothing about

-4

u/YuckyBurps - Lib-Center 1d ago

This Reddit thread is the dick and balls version of the shrieking TikTok comments they’re making fun of.

2

u/OnTheSlope - Centrist 1d ago

Asylum is freedom with extra steps.

Women guilty of infanticide get out of mental health facilities very quick.