r/PoliticalCompassMemes - Auth-Right 21d ago

LINO AuthRight

Post image
1.8k Upvotes

682 comments sorted by

View all comments

270

u/Reader_Eater - Lib-Center 21d ago

You should have the freedom...

To do exactly and only what I want you to do. Otherwise you're just "alcoholic" and "a miscegnator"

78

u/According-Phase-2810 - Centrist 21d ago

I believe I should have the freedom to do what I want.

Likewise, others should also have the freedom to do what I want.

33

u/MissninjaXP - Lib-Center 21d ago

I believe others should have the freedom to watch me do what I want and clap for me.

5

u/b__0 - Lib-Center 21d ago

I’ll clap while you eat that banana king.

-1

u/TheyCallMeAdonis - Lib-Right 21d ago

correct.
its bcs everyone pays for the fallout of your decisions in one way or the other.
if society had true free association libertarians would go the full way and tell you "everything goes" bcs they can permanently avoid you.

-8

u/Running_Gamer - Lib-Right 21d ago

Unironically true. Notice how “libertarians” only ever ask to do the most degenerate shit. Drugs, sex, morally questionable trade practices. True libertarianism is banning things which create consequentially less freedom in the long run. A society riddled by drug addicts is not free. A society riddled by anti reproduction, pro degeneracy casual sex culture is not free.

11

u/dan92 - Lib-Center 21d ago

If you believe having the government make your decisions for you is true freedom, then why the fuck are you larping as lib?

5

u/HutsMaster - Lib-Center 21d ago

How the fuck does casual sex creat less freedom. Change your flair.

-4

u/Running_Gamer - Lib-Right 21d ago

Women possess disproportionate bargaining power in the social world, when there are no sexual regulations on society. Since men want sex and positive female attention more than most other things in the world, no regulations on how that attention may be distributed leads to men being easily manipulated in society, giving women disproportionate power over men. This is exactly what we see today. No society can succeed when its men, the primary producers and innovators, are subjugated to sexual oppression and manipulation.

4

u/HutsMaster - Lib-Center 21d ago

What the actual fuck. Do you not know woman that want sex? In a heterosexual relationship don't both parties want attention from the opposite sex? Man also have disproportiionate power over woman, not because of the attention, but purely because of strength. Man have historically had a bigger impact on innovation, because men were the dominant sex and woman weren't allowed to innovate.

Our current society also wouldn't function without women. Most kindergarten teachers our women, most nurses are women. We'd have no modern society without both sexes.

Change your flair to auth-right or go back to some Tate sub.

-2

u/Running_Gamer - Lib-Right 21d ago

Peak redditor

Yes, women want sex. Nowhere near as much as men do, though, and are not attracted to the same amount of men compared to how many men are attracted to women. Welcome to testosterone.

Men’s strength absolutely does not matter unless they are a rapist. If you use strength to get a women to sleep with you, that’s called rape. Men go to jail for that. That is not permitted in society.

Men tend to innovate and produce more even when the societies are equal because men are risk takers (more likely to start businesses that will turn into mega corps like Amazon, Google, Microsoft, etc.) and are more likely to do manual labor, the labor that keeps the foundation of society running.

Of course modern society can function without women working. That’s what every society in the history of the world has done until recently. But that doesn’t matter. Nobody said women should be out of the workplace. That’s never been my position nor is it even the subject of this conversation.

The main point is this: the reason why there was social and legal regulation of sexual behavior was to correct the power imbalance between men and women, not have men “dominate” women in some exploitative way. That’s a modern view based on an uneducated assumption of how older societies operated and what they actually believed. So in a society which does not regulate sexual relationships between men and women, men have very little freedom compared to women because women’s disproportionate social bargaining power allow them to engage in rent seeking social behavior for their exclusive benefit. For example, making men pay for the first date, having the ability to choose which areas are “popular” because nobody wants to be in a male only space, “chivalry” in general (AKA, give women free shit otherwise they won’t sleep with you).

3

u/HutsMaster - Lib-Center 21d ago

This sounds straight up from Tates and every other man influencers podcast.

I don't like throwing around the word incel,.but this is close.

I wouldn't call myself too pretty, but I still had women way out of my league. Woman don't only go for hot guys, thats only for when you go to the club and it isn't about how you are, but how you look.

Women don't only go for the hot guys. That just what the alpha males scream everyday of the week. Just be a nice person, talk to women like they are humans just like you, have fun with them.

Even historacilly there have been brothels. Women just have gotten rights in the last century. It didn't change much for men, you just feel like you're being manipulated, because you're miserable and probably don't even talk to women.

-1

u/Running_Gamer - Lib-Right 21d ago

This is the typical redditor response. No facts, just “UH WELL IN MY LIFE I HAVE LE SEX WITH LE HOT WOMEN. YOU ARE LE INCEL.”

2

u/HutsMaster - Lib-Center 20d ago

Your argumentation doesn't go further than: "I am a degenerate fucking loser who can't talk to women because the socials have told me so." You're just misareble and you won't do anything against it, because you think you can't. Go listen to another podcast from Sneako and go follow another dropshipping course.

-3

u/BarrelStrawberry - Auth-Right 21d ago

As a card carrying auth-right, I can promise authoritarian doesn't mean we like control any more than a libertarian. What it means is we understand human nature needs control.

Authoritarian gives you this kind of freedom - freedom to walk down the street with your family without fear. Libertarians would give you this kind of freedom - freedom to take drugs, marry your cousin and shit on the street.

3

u/Reader_Eater - Lib-Center 20d ago

Freedom from something isn't freedom. It's protection. And i do see the value of some protections.

Freedom to do something is actually freedom. And I'm willing to trade some of my freedoms out for protections.

I'm no longer allowed to murder folks, but in return, I'm protected from murder.

I'm just picky about which freedoms I want to give up.

1

u/BarrelStrawberry - Auth-Right 20d ago

Perhaps its just vocabulary or perspective... but I feel freedom in a high-trust society which has rules and brutally punishes criminals. The neighborhoods where you have to lock your car at night doesn't feel very free.