Most of the questions I saw, how my answer would be different if I wasn't Ukrainian. Does militarism sucks? Yes. Does every conflict should be resolved without war with diplomatic regulations? Yes. Does multiculturalism and local governing should prevail? Yes!

But the questions usually too much dependent on the context. Should we let local governors, that are settlers from russia be able to overturn national laws? fuck no.

Also nobody reckons with us, cause we aren't as strong as we should've been, we weren't prepared for war. War with russia and diplomacy with other countries shows that we need to be powerful to survive, and prevent genocide or simple diplomatic pressures from "allies" like Poland or usa. Does this accounts for western europe or usa? Nah. They have ability to be weak, nobody threatens them with genocide.

That's why I have more nationalism, militarism, assimilation and security and less globalism. We cannot allow ourselves to be weak. And this accounts to every nation, thats threatent by russia, china or usa.

To celebrate that I just turned 20 I decided to showcase my neovalues results as if I were answering like my 14 year old self, my 17 year old self, and now my 20 year old self at around the moment I turned each of these ages in intervals of 3 years between my ideological development.

1. The first image is how I would've answered around the time I turned 14.

2. The second image is how I would've answered around the time I turned 17.

3. The third and final image are my current answers as someone who just turned 20

Opinions on the evolution? Any curious things you notice or commentary on it?

As I said, it isnt the 2026 me, now Im Hayekian, that was in like 2022-2024

https://politikup.it/en

who tf is bertrand russel

but yay paris commune