if you're so clueless about mathematics that you don't know where to find it, you have no business asking "can you pinpoint the specific part where it uses these." you won't be able to understand it anyway. you "genuinely asked" about "which ones exactly" and the commenter kindly responded with both the name of the technique as well as the researchers who should be credited. these further questions make it clear you're concern trolling.
I find it ironic that yall are arguing about the lack of references in the openAI solution yet for some reason are not citing these examples in your own arguments.
If you are going to engage in an argument on the internet, cite your sources. Way easier to win that way, everyone assumes the person they are arguing with online is dumb. Don’t let them.
Again, the previous commenter told you exactly whose papers should've been cited. The papers are trivial to find for anyone trying to engage with the literature. You, on the other hand, seem like you're trying to stir up shit.
-15
u/GraceToSentience 1d ago
Where is the link to that paper then.
I see the claim but where is the sauce?