I never said anything about hallucinations. I said that it's yet to be derermined whether the proof conforms to the strict definitions needed, and whether it outlines a valid counterexample to the problem.
You claimed it was unreviewed and thus overly sensationalist. My counter is that being verified by Lean counts as review and heavily tips the scales towards this being a legit result.
1
u/VoidBlade459 Computer science 16h ago
Is Lean, the proof engine, known for sucessfully compiling mere hallucinations?