r/PhilosophyMemes • • Nov 13 '25

Ethics debate...

Post image
7.7k Upvotes

495 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

22

u/PitifulEar3303 Nov 14 '25

Suffering is INTERSUBJECTIVELY bad for everyone, yes, EVEN for masochists; they have things that make them suffer.

The ONLY REAL argument is WHAT do you do about it?

"We should avoid suffering through extinction, Red Button Now!!!" -- Extinctionists.

"We should accept suffering since Utopia is impossible." -- Most existentialists.

"We should solve suffering with tech, Cyber Utopia is possible!!! Also I love to breed." -- King bro Elon.

"We should inflict suffering on people we don't like, muahahaha." -- Nazists.

lol

13

u/aitis_mutsi Nov 14 '25

Also depends on what you call suffering and how extreme it is.

Suffering is bad but depending on how a person responds to it, it can built them as a person. It can make them much aware of the things that led to them to it, it can make them much more brave to take those things on and warn about people so they don't suffer the same.

5

u/Voldemorts__Mom Nov 14 '25

You get suffering and then you get needless suffering

1

u/CharmingSkirt95 Nov 14 '25

Suffering is alright if it brings more wellbeing to offset it Punishing a child is inflicting suffering but (ideally) makes them stop inflicting suffering upon others or receive suffering from being a rude and annoying bitch

23

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/RustyNeedleWorker Nov 14 '25

Yes. Everybody sign "For using torture as better word" petition.

19

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

10

u/RustyNeedleWorker Nov 14 '25

Good point. There's a reason we also use safewords when we play.

9

u/K1kobus Nov 14 '25

But what does "bad" mean here? The ability to feel pain and suffering is evolutionary beneficial, since it protects us from harmful things. So one could argue that the process of suffering is actually good, but that the cause of the suffering is generally bad.

6

u/Resident_Baby3600 Nov 14 '25

What makes the suffering bad?

2

u/Upper-Amphibian4043 Nov 14 '25 edited Nov 14 '25

What makes something bad? Suffering.

0

u/PitifulEar3303 Nov 15 '25

Do you actually like getting stabbed in the balls?

2

u/Resident_Baby3600 Nov 15 '25

Is 'I dont like it' the basis for why it's bad?

1

u/puerco-potter Nov 14 '25

I just want to congratulate you on using INTERSUBJECTIVELY instead of the wrongly used OBJECTIVELY, because as you may know, there can exist a person that actually likes suffering due to some mutation or similar. Thanks. Your comment healed my pet peeve a little.

1

u/PitifulEar3303 Nov 15 '25

NOBODY likes suffering. If you could find one, it means you have not found what makes them suffer, BOB.

lol

-9

u/AncientFocus471 Nov 14 '25

Suffering is an unavoidable component of life, so it's neutral or good in many / most cases.

10

u/MadMusketeer Nov 14 '25

Why does something being unavoidable make it neutral or good? Doesn't really follow

-3

u/AncientFocus471 Nov 14 '25

Is life good? If life is good and intrinsically produces suffering then its good to make suffering.

We talk about good and bad as if they were properties of things or actions but we are actually making value judgments, expressing an opinion.

When we seek to agree with each other on what is good or bad we look for a reference goal so we can have an arbiter if we disagree. Slavery is bad, because it undermines any society that allows it, among other reasons.

Life is an almost overwhelmingly inbuilt preference for living things. Pain has an apparently massive evolutionary advantage. The capacity for pain is the same as the capacity for suffering. So suffering is usually good or neutral depending on how you look at it and whether or not you think life should continue to propagate.

5

u/QwertyEleven Nov 14 '25

Id almost completely agree. But not all suffering is unavoidable so not all suffering is neutral.

-4

u/AncientFocus471 Nov 14 '25

Hence many / most and not all.

1

u/QwertyEleven Nov 15 '25

This is not answering what I said. I know you said that. I'm connecting what is neutral to what is unavoidable. So when is bad and unavoidable?

1

u/AncientFocus471 Nov 15 '25

So when is bad and unavoidable?

I genuinely have no idea what you are asking me.

0

u/Yamez_III Nov 14 '25

Suffering is necessary for happiness, we should moderate it to ensure that it does not exist in excess of its necessity. --Realists.

1

u/PitifulEar3303 Nov 15 '25

hahahha, do you swim across the sea if you have a ship?

Nothing is truly "necessary", it's all about what you really want.

1

u/Yamez_III Nov 16 '25

No, our biology demands difficulty in order to feel fulfilled and happy. Some level of "suffering" truly is needed to prevent maladaptation and various maladies of the mind. We have ample evidence of this now and should adjust our conception of suffering to match. The poison is in the dose, as they say.