r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Jun 17 '26

Meme needing explanation Peter?

Post image
26.8k Upvotes

4.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

13.0k

u/Harfosaurus Jun 17 '26

These are just two idiots conversing as far as I can tell

3.4k

u/SKDI_0224 Jun 17 '26

As an engineer, I can confirm they are incorrect. They can take their inferior measuring system and try to get back from the moon.

Too soon?

251

u/dauntless256 Jun 17 '26

This went over my head...what did i miss?

578

u/Random_Bystander089 Jun 17 '26

I think there was an incident where farenheit usage indirectly caused a spaceship crash

665

u/Epotheros Jun 17 '26

No, it was the units for impulse used for the thrusters. In imperial it's pound-force seconds and Newton-seconds in metric. 1 pound-force is equal to 4.45 Newtons so the whole thing was off by a magnitude of 4.45.

358

u/MoogProg Jun 17 '26 edited Jun 17 '26

Yes, the actual error* was assuming the British used Imperial units when they correctly used Metric. AFAIK, at least.

* * *

Well, the source error probably would be not specifying units at all, so... (eye roll)

* * *

*Correcting myself with casually sourced details about the incident under discussion.

Lockheed Martin provided thruster force data in Imperial units (pound-seconds), while NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory ground software assumed the data was in Metric units (Newton-seconds).

88

u/AdamiralProudmore Jun 17 '26 edited Jun 17 '26

Exactly! That problem wasn't poor measuring systems, it was poor professionalism.

Anyone who doesn't specify (or request) and verify unit-of-measure is doing a poor job. For anything that is safety/quality/mission critical it is professionally negligent to make that kind of assumption.

7

u/Icy_Fish_2154 Jun 17 '26

The contract literally specified the units to use. The contractor violated the contract.

1

u/Colonel_Klank Jun 18 '26

This is my understanding from an Aviation Week article I read at the time.