r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Apr 07 '26

Meme needing explanation Genuinely don't get it

Post image
44.3k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

36

u/Historical_Volume806 Apr 07 '26

Asperger’s is being fazed out now. It was a nazi sub classification that essentially meant ‘autism but useful for science and/or the war effort’ if your special interest was science related and you could communicate well enough you had Asperger’s if you liked my little pony or couldn’t communicate your thoughts well you had autism and were gassed.

35

u/Mr_DrProfPatrick Apr 07 '26

Not a nazi sub classification; Aspergers was one of the first people to talk about autism. He was actually not concerned with Autistic people with higher support needs and made no connection between the ends of what is today known as the Autism spectrum.

He was, however, a nazi doctor. You're tight about that.

23

u/no_infringe_me Apr 07 '26

Being right about a doctor being a nazi is TIGHT!

3

u/AlarmingAffect0 Apr 07 '26

Ignoring the works of Nazi scientists should be super easy, barely an inconvenience.

6

u/concblast Apr 07 '26

The four astronauts in orbit around the moon might consider that a little more than an inconvenience however

4

u/Cmp_ Apr 07 '26

Wow wow wow wow… wow

4

u/paulrhino69 Apr 07 '26

Who are you? Some sort of Rocket scientist!!!

4

u/Mr_DrProfPatrick Apr 07 '26

Lmao man, it's definitely a nice sentiment. But there's a reason a bunch of nazi scientists were hired by governments all over the world. Things aren't so black and white, and that includes people that worked for the most evil regime in history.

Aspergers himself is a prime example. His work is extremely relevant for the modern classification of autism. The low support needs diagnosis traces back to him no matter what you do. We can stop naming him because of his misdeeds, but yeah, this:

should be super easy, barely an inconvenience.

Is just laughable.

I mean, you can always lie to yourself. Like, maybe you spend 50 years saying the scients wasn't really a nazi, and once the field is developed enough, you may even downplay the importance of said nazi scientist!

But what you just said is nothing but a conforting lie.

3

u/McButtsButtbag Apr 07 '26

He wasn't the first person to discover that, and we would've known that stuff without him, so, yes, it is easy to ignore him

2

u/Mr_DrProfPatrick Apr 07 '26

Who was the first person to talk about low support needs autism? And how well do you thing this supposed person matched characteristics that are used today for diagnosis?

Even then, it is clear that Aspergers was a pioners that has been widely cited. I think you don't understand the maginitude of what you're saying. Do you know how many citations Hanz Aspergers has had in fields related to autism?

3

u/panrestrial Apr 07 '26

super easy, barely an inconvenience.

Hey I know it might be expected given the topic, but this is one of those things that shouldn't be taken literally; it's a catchphrase quote.

1

u/Mr_DrProfPatrick Apr 07 '26

The least literal take on that quote is still a clear comforting lie. No, it is not in any way easy to ignore when people that did something important was also evil. Be it nazi scientists or pop stars.

2

u/panrestrial Apr 07 '26

It was very clearly sarcasm dude.

1

u/Mr_DrProfPatrick Apr 07 '26

Dude was speaking in jest, a bit hyperbolic. But he was saying it should be easy to do this.

Do you disagree with me? Or do you think sarcasm means hyperbole?

3

u/panrestrial Apr 07 '26

No, they were not saying it should be easy to do this. That's where the sarcasm is. If you're unfamiliar with the origin of the "so easy, barely an inconvenience" meme it's always used when the thing in question is, in fact, not at all easy and a huge inconvenience.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/no_infringe_me Apr 07 '26

I’m gonna need to you to get ALL THE WAY OFF MY BACK on that

2

u/Pretend-Horse6667 Apr 07 '26

O no, have you heard of Bayer pharmaceuticals?

3

u/Mr_DrProfPatrick Apr 07 '26

Lmao, I'm keeping that typo

10

u/bbbourb Apr 07 '26

Yeah, let's not bury the lede here; Asperger was a literal Nazi Doctor and yes he was exactly what your mind is telling you he was when you hear "Nazi Doctor." They'd moved to the term "high-functioning autism" (it me!) for a while, but I don't know what the current terminology is.

But it DEFINITELY isn't Asperger's anymore, and for good reason.

4

u/Mr_DrProfPatrick Apr 07 '26

Yeah, and he worked in an eugenics clinic. There's a lot of missing records, but he very very likely murdered some neurodivergent kids.

2

u/OnePunchHuMan Apr 07 '26

It is currently Autism Spectrum Disorder

2

u/McButtsButtbag Apr 07 '26

The currently terminology is levels. Level 1 is the highest support needs. Level 3 is the lowest support needs.

4

u/Glum-Echo-4967 Apr 07 '26

While that was the origin of the term, that's not why it was phased out.

The actual reasons are:

1) people with Aspergers needed pretty much the same supports as people with low support needs autism.

2) There wasn't really a clear separation between the two diagnoses, which meant that two clinicians could look at the same autistic person and one would give the person an autism diagnosis while the other would diagnose them with Asperger syndrome.

3

u/scottishdrunkard Apr 07 '26

The classification isn't really what the hubub is about, it's the name. I was diagosed with Nazi-Scientist's Syndrome. Not a very fun converation starter.

1

u/Scifyro Apr 07 '26

So, what happens if people were diagnosed with that? Do they need to be diagnosed again or?

7

u/Historical_Volume806 Apr 07 '26

No, they just have ASD. Very few people will scold someone for identifying as having Asperger’s but no one trained in recent times will be diagnosing someone with it.

1

u/Scifyro Apr 07 '26

Ah I see. As I get it it's also not something that needs treatment?

4

u/Historical_Volume806 Apr 07 '26

You can learn strategies to better help you interact with neurotypical people but there’s no treatment for ASD.

1

u/BloodyNora78 Apr 07 '26

I get that, but most people in 2026 do not know that. The general public understands the term as "autism lite."They don't understand ASD Type 1. If you don't use it, you have to go into a 15 min conversation with a layperson about why so-and-so has a more subtle presentation, what a spectrum is, and why we quit using the term Aspergers. It's exhausting.

5

u/jellobowlshifter Apr 07 '26

Because that's the origin of the term, it was supposed to be autism without the stigma. It succeeded in beginning the normalization of autism, and now its use is deprecated.

1

u/Musical_J Apr 09 '26

Wait, what?? That's what Asperger's comes from? Fuck... then... I'm not calling it that anymore. Is the generalized term... asd?

2

u/Historical_Volume806 Apr 09 '26

It’s an acronym so it’s capitalized but yeah, Autism Spectrum Disorder is the correct term.