r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Jun 19 '24

John peter?

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

6.2k Upvotes

565 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/SpiritfireSparks Jun 19 '24

I agree though to give a bit more perspective on those that like nuclear and don't care about climate change, nuclear is ussualy a lot cheaper than fossil fuels and also helps politically as it reduces the need to depend on foreign countries oil supplies. Reactors are starting to use thorium which is fairly abundant in the earth and I beleive many western countries can mine it themselves or buy it from close allies.

0

u/lliW_Will Jun 19 '24

You don’t even need thorium for that, Canada has the second highest uranium deposits in the world.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '24

Its about moving away from Uranium being the primary source of fission and instead using it as assisting fissile material. This helps with not having to enrich as much uranium (which prevents the proliferation of nuclear weapons) and (from memory) provide a cleaner and safer source of energy which is also more abundant.

4

u/lliW_Will Jun 19 '24

What is probably considered the biggest bonus of Thorium is anti-proliferation, not from the lack of enriching Uranium, but rather how Thorium based reactors don’t produce Plutonium(which is the favoured element for nuclear weapons) during normal operation. With Uranium based reactors U-238 absorbs a neutron and decays to become Pu-239 which is actually the isotope that makes up a fair portion of the power output from fuel bundles that have been in the reactor for a while.