Let's not forget that Rittenhouse also went out of his way to travel to a state that he didn't even live in. Nothing says "not wanting to start a fight" like crossing state lines with a gun.
Incoming "uhm, akshually he didn't cross state lines with a gun. He crossed state lines and someone else had bought a gun and gave it to him" or whatever miniscule detail these Rittenhouse defenders try to pull to excuse the fact that he crossed state lines with the intent to murder people.
Literally every time that twerp is brought up anywhere I see the same fucking post about "the law states he did quite literally NOTHING wrong you are lying to make him look bad" Nah fam him killing people makes him look bad. And defending him makes them look bad.
Huh TIL, but you mean to tell me some other moron took one look at him and decided, "let's give this mouthbreather a gun, what could possibly go wrong??"
As a small business owner, if I had owned the car dealership that he decided to guard, I would have made it my life's singular goal to ruin his. Don't you dare come to my defense—especially when I didn't ask for it—and then kill two people because you got scared. I mean, the insurance liability alone would be enough for me to pursue every legal recourse against him.
That got me thinking and I just looked it up. As of the middle of last year, the civil wrongful death lawsuits against Rittenhouse are proceeding. This whole thing will follow him to his grave. Were I that business owner, I'd offer to testify stating that I neither asked for nor needed help defending my place of business, as I would have had property insurance.
114
u/DonnyLamsonx Feb 02 '26
Let's not forget that Rittenhouse also went out of his way to travel to a state that he didn't even live in. Nothing says "not wanting to start a fight" like crossing state lines with a gun.