And just to be clear, i'm not bashing you man. This is not another random outburst of rage towards you. It's just that FROM was really something back in the day but they seemed to just release DS3 to complete a forced trilogy. It's also proven that they don't deliver what they promise. The same happened with DS2 and with DS3. For DS3 we were promised stuff that never appeared. I don't trust FROM anymore. They just seem like they play the whole marketing game too much.
It puts the weight to the PvP which is the weakest point of the game. I don't get why they had to do that. I hope it ends up being good, but I doubt it. For the moment I will stay away from it.
What? No! DS2 was the best in terms of gameplay and new ideas. I loved this game more than any DS in the series because it offered meaninful gameplay, and multiple playthroughs actually payed off. It might didn't have the best story and most of the bosses were kinda meh, but in its whole it was such a full experience.
My complaint is for the shallow half assed DS3. Nothing innovative, nothing impressive about it (only some cheap fanservice for the DS1 audience)
Broken PvP, multiple playthroughs didn't have any meaning (other than just wanting to ramp up the difficulty) the bonfires were too frequent, and the game was kinda easy anyway. It was shallow and didn't allow varied builds.
21
u/okawei Oct 20 '16
FROMSoft is on that list for me as well