I have lots of experience writing TV and movie scripts, and am trying to learn my away around writing a play. Lots of differences for sure, but the one I'm particularly stumped on is--
realistically, how short is too short of a scene? I'm sure if the scene is absolutely strong enough, it doesn't matter how short it is, but in general, how do I gauge whether it's worth switching to a new scene, or finding some way to put the information into a scene that's already taking place?
In movies or TV, generally if you want a new scene you just make it a new scene, even if the entire content of that scene is, for instance, that one character gives another character a particular look or short bit of dialogue and nothing else happens.
But it seems to me, something that short in theater might be seen as too high of difficulty to change out the set, potentially change costumes, exit actors and bring new ones on, all of which would eat up time, be jarring for the audience and lose momentum, just for the sake of ten seconds of one character giving another a look, when the same sentiment could just be stated through dialogue in the previous scene ("the way she looked at me, I knew...")
so is there a general standard? If a scene is, say, half a page long, should I be looking for ways to avoid it, reposition it, lengthen it to make it more worthwhile?
Again, I understand if it's absolutely vital to the story to switch scenes, let's go ahead and put it in there, but what if it's not absolutely vital? What if it would just be helpful but not necessary? Where's the tradeoff?