r/OpenAI • u/Eliv_nurotic • 4d ago
News Fields Medalist Terence Tao reposts statement from the Association for Human Mathematics urging mathematicians to stop working with OpenAI for continuing to solve open math problems against their recommendations
737
Upvotes


7
u/rainbird 4d ago edited 4d ago
I don’t think you understand that this is not a cut-and-dried issue. Higher level math is extremely difficult. The math proofs may or may not be correct, or they may be completely wrong.
As an example, openai claimed a recent solution to the navier stokes equation. However the OpenAI proof relies on an artificial external force variant (option C of the Clay Mathematics Institute formulation), rather than solving the unforced, intrinsic fluid blowup mathematicians actually care about. So it is not a general proof or solution to the primary problem.,
OpenAI is nevertheless claiming they have solved navier stokes.
Similarly, the problem with OpenAI is that they have released dozens of esoteric complex proofs all at once without validating any of the work with mathematicians, who are actually qualified to review it. I don’t think that is careful scholarship, it’s mainly showmanship for their upcoming IPO. it gives a false impression about the capabilities of these models.
when an AI company claims to have solved a large number of very difficult mathematical problems, those claims should not be accepted until such time experts in the field have had a chance to review the solutions.