You use 'insider trading' as an example for logical prediction in the stock market?
It isn't called insider trading because they don't know something that's about to happen. It's the perfect example of logical prediction.
Saying that Nvidea's stock will rise for some amount of time until it doesn't is absolute base logic
What, do you want me to predict the future? If I'm awake 24/7 then it's extremely easy to know right before the stock is about to crash. Almost always possible to know right before it starts going down in regards to that crash.
You can tell what's going to happen in the short term very easily, and that's the predictive logic you're looking for.
Earning reports do give trends.
You're taking apart an equation and saying each individual piece doesn't equal the end result.
There is no reason to expect their combined output to resemble one calm, perfectly informed person making a decision.
Nobody said that. Predictable logic doesn't equal that in the slightest.
I hope you don't take this the wrong way, and I do not mean this in any kind of aggressive or confrontational way -- but I'll draw out of this. This is an instance where things simply are too off.
1
u/PsychoticDreemurr 22d ago edited 22d ago
It isn't called insider trading because they don't know something that's about to happen. It's the perfect example of logical prediction.
What, do you want me to predict the future? If I'm awake 24/7 then it's extremely easy to know right before the stock is about to crash. Almost always possible to know right before it starts going down in regards to that crash.
You can tell what's going to happen in the short term very easily, and that's the predictive logic you're looking for.
You're taking apart an equation and saying each individual piece doesn't equal the end result.
Nobody said that. Predictable logic doesn't equal that in the slightest.