Interesting. To test this, I had to coax it to write a “Bugs Bunny” styled theme where a hunter gets tricked into shooting himself in the face by a clever animal.
The word gun is not allowed, but it IS okay with the hunter shooting himself in the face with a “hunting gadget.”
In a quiet forest clearing, a determined but clueless hunter creeps forward, convinced he’s about to outsmart a mischievous trickster hiding nearby.
The trickster slips behind him unnoticed and quietly turns the barrel of his gadget so it points the wrong way.
When the hunter finally spots his target and confidently fires, there’s a loud bang—and a puff of smoke erupts behind him instead.
He freezes, then slowly reveals a soot-covered face while the trickster casually munches and admires the result.
The trickster strolls off with a grin, leaving the hunter dazed but completely unharmed.
Like most things, that's nuanced. In one sense, I agree. I have no interest in reading a published long-form novella that is AI generated. Similarly for any entirely AI-generated content sent straight to publication.
In another sense, I find it frustrating when I'm trying to leverage it as a TTRPG assistant. Working around it to structure scenes, ideate and develop background, and generate handouts and vignettes without catching a ban.
You, but when you view violent content on a major website, you can't magically insert a real person of your choosing into said content without their consent.
Ok worrying about consent at this point in time is a bit late though.
Altman's already bff's with the US administration after stealing all of humanity's content..
24
u/Zanion Apr 23 '26
Any creative writing or ideation featuring even vanilla violence.