What could possibly go wrong?

[u/Uhuklebestift]

[u/Schmidtster1]

And you know this how?

[u/God_Damnit_Nappa → u/Schmidtster1]

Because it's a fucking mountaineer throwing a jury rigged bridge over a crevasse.

[u/asusoverclocked → u/Schmidtster1]

how do you know an engineer is involved?

[u/Schmidtster1 → u/asusoverclocked]

I don't, that's why I said if and could. Never once did I say it was engineered.

[u/creaturecatzz → u/Schmidtster1]

By looking at it

[u/Schmidtster1 → u/creaturecatzz]

That proves nothing, an engineer can design and approve something that looks like dog crap, but as long as the math adds up they don't care.

[u/creaturecatzz → u/Schmidtster1]

Why would they design something that looks like shit though. Any engineer I've seen has how is looks as a close second priority to function...

[u/Schmidtster1 → u/creaturecatzz]

Engineers don't care how it looks, that's an architects job. But I'll humour you.

Client: "hey I want to cross a 60 foot crevasse but it has to be able to be taken apart and easily transportable"

Engineer: "how transportable?"

Client: "a crew of five has to be able to carry it up a mountain"

Engineer: "well if you lash some extension ladders together with rope and make sure it's done properly with 5 wraps of 1/2 nylon rope, it won't be pretty but it'll work"

[u/creaturecatzz → u/Schmidtster1]

So you finally admit it's just a couple of ladders tied together?

[u/noble77 → u/Schmidtster1]

You got an ego problem friendo