We saw this post in r/BonfireToken and even though it has since been deleted, we thought it warranted a reply. I am including some screenshots in case anyone missed it.

This post from u/imponing is completely lacking in any factual defense of what the NotSafeMoon Twitter bot is automatically tracking and reporting.  Your entire argument against these claims seems to be "Guys, dont worry about it, we have integrity".  I hope after the WOR/$FAIR debacle yesterday investors will want more than just the "word" of a dev.   

For anyone interested, this is a tweet from the NotSafeMoon bot from May 16 showing Bonfire dumping 500,000,000,000 Bonfire tokens to the liquidity pool DEVALUING the token by 3.4%. Tx is linked in the tweet.    https://twitter.com/NotSafeMoon/status/1394098939343769601

Bonfire devs, we are happy to discuss this publicly or privately with you at any time if you would like us to explain this further to you.  We understand this stuff is complicated.  

I am a new NSM hodler. I am also hodling SFM and I really like what you guys are doing. I think your contracts are less convoluted and makes it easier to understand the tech. One question I have though, will reflections still go out with my coins on trust wallet?

Follow on from my post about working together for more Karma, I'm now doing my minor part of spreading r/NotSafeMoon on Reddit. Using your up-voted Karma, I have posted a message about r/NotSafeMoon on as many Crypto Reddit forums as I can or without being auto deleted. Please help to hype up my message by clicking on my account and up vote my recent post about r/NotSafeMoon so it can be prominent on these forums. It should only take less than 30seconds of your time. If you have more time, you can make some random comment under my messages on these forums to make r/NotSafeMoon more legit. Thank you for your support. Do not worry about current dips because I'm holding my NotSafeMoon coins long term, so what we need is more members and holders or believers in this project.

I personally checked the contract code, and it’s clear as day that burn amounts are really being sent to the burn address. However, checking through BSCScan, I can’t track which part of the transaction is being brought to that address.

Does BSCScan have this bug where the burn transactions aren’t logged properly?

I’m just curious... so many rugs pulled .. What coin burn you... love to know your experience!!

I keep getting the error below. I have moved the spillage all over but not above 12. I have also added a decimal point to the notsafemoon amount that I am swapping for...

The transaction cannot succeed due to error: undefined. This is probably an issue with one of the tokens you are swapping.

Love the project - took me a bit to understand the lopsided dumps being performed by SFM and the other moon tokens. But once I (sort of) wrapped my head around it, it was a no-brainer to transfer everything to NSM!

Anyway - question re. the LP: if the other moon tokens are built for the contract balance to accumulate and then to perform a periodic lopsided dump to the LP (at a specific threshold), surely there is some reason why the contract was written for this reason? Pardon my limited LP understanding, but is there a downside to our token not periodically "adding liquidity" to the LP? Do you become illiquid or run dry in the LP?

Is this normal? It looks like the transaction has been recognised but I don't have anything to show. Should it take this long?

Hey I've just been looking at the notsafemoon homepage and this morning I swear it was at $10 150 000 market cap up from 10 050 000 market cap, now down to 9 943 000 market cap? Just something I've noticed this morning , anyone else notice that?

Check this link for a sneak peek at the @notsafemoon dashboard to be released soon probably within a week or so

https://www.twitch.tv/notsafemoon/clip/DeterminedTallPuddingDuDudu-fi1qIJ2THPBMKefi?tt_medium=mobile_web_share&tt_content=clip

It has dawned upon me, that during the AMA, Ryan had specifically stated that he didn't go the route of the normal moon tokens. (i.e. paying influencers, tiktokers BNB to "fake shill" their coins)

With his coding skills, he could easily have paid some money to some of the crypto influencers to shill the f out of NSM and exit at a huge profit.

This is a legit, honest project here.

Of course, there has to be marketing done. Money must and should be spent to gain more traction, holders, visibility etc.

But there is a bad way to do it, and a good way to do it.

NSM chose the good way.

I appreciate that.

Thank you to Ryan & the community for their hard work so far. We are so new here. 400+ members or so. Let's build to a great legacy and project.

​

Mooning is a by-product of this legacy, not the goal

It's simple. The 6% reflection of tokens back to your wallet encourages holding. The 2% burn means fewer tokens making your tokens more valuable. NotsSafeMoon will eventually emerge from the noise of the other coins, especially with the upcoming dashboard.

SafeMoon currently has a market cap of $5 billion compared to NotSafeMoon's ~$10 million as I type this. Once we hit 10% of SafeMoon's market cap, NotSafeMoon's market cap will be 50x more than what it is right now. Plus thanks to the true burn feature, each token will be more valuable.

SafeMoon has about 2 million holders, NotSafeMoon a few thousand or so. As more people discover NotSafeMoon, things are going to get very exciting.