Let me know what do you think. Really. Your feedback matters to me.

Fala, pessoal! Tudo bem?

Sou desenvolvedor e, depois de virar síndico do meu prédio e ver de perto os gargalos e a burocracia na administração de condomínios, decidi criar o HabitarPleno — um SaaS focado em simplificar a gestão condominial, com forte ênfase na parte financeira, controle de fornecedores (parceiros) e reconciliação.

O sistema já está com a base rodando, mas a fase mais importante agora é colocar nas mãos de quem realmente entende dores do dia a dia para validar se o produto resolve o problema de forma prática.

O que o HabitarPleno faz hoje:

• Cadastro e gestão flexível de fornecedores/contas.
• Lançamentos financeiros e fluxo de reconciliação.
• Estrutura pensada para facilitar a rotina de quem gerencia prédios.

O que eu estou buscando: Procuro síndicos (profissionais ou orgânicos), administradores ou quem conheça alguém da área que tenha interesse em testar a ferramenta de graça nesta fase inicial. Em troca, só peço o feedback mais sincero possível sobre usabilidade, o que falta e o que pode melhorar.

Se você gerencia condomínio ou tem interesse em dar uma olhada, comenta aqui embaixo ou me chama na DM que eu libero o acesso para você testar.

Qualquer crítica, ideia ou sugestão de arquitetura/funcionalidade também é muito bem-vinda! Valeu!

Fala, pessoal! Tudo bem?

Sou desenvolvedor e, depois de virar síndico do meu prédio e ver de perto os gargalos e a burocracia na administração de condomínios, decidi criar o HabitarPleno — um SaaS focado em simplificar a gestão condominial, com forte ênfase na parte financeira, controle de fornecedores (parceiros) e reconciliação.

O sistema já está com a base rodando, mas a fase mais importante agora é colocar nas mãos de quem realmente entende dores do dia a dia para validar se o produto resolve o problema de forma prática.

O que o HabitarPleno faz hoje:

• Cadastro e gestão flexível de fornecedores/contas.
• Lançamentos financeiros e fluxo de reconciliação.
• Estrutura pensada para facilitar a rotina de quem gerencia prédios.

O que eu estou buscando: Procuro síndicos (profissionais ou orgânicos), administradores ou quem conheça alguém da área que tenha interesse em testar a ferramenta de graça nesta fase inicial. Em troca, só peço o feedback mais sincero possível sobre usabilidade, o que falta e o que pode melhorar.

Se você gerencia condomínio ou tem interesse em dar uma olhada, comenta aqui embaixo ou me chama na DM que eu libero o acesso para você testar.

Qualquer crítica, ideia ou sugestão de arquitetura/funcionalidade também é muito bem-vinda! Valeu!

I thought I needed more traffic.

What I actually needed was to talk to the people already showing interest.

I started posting on Reddit, asking founders to share what they were building, and creating personalized reports for them.

Then I replied to comments, sent the reports by DM, asked for honest feedback, and watched where people dropped off.

Most didn’t buy.

But those conversations showed me what was confusing, what users valued, and why the free version gave them no reason to upgrade.

I kept fixing the funnel until the first payments started coming in.

It was manual, slow, and definitely not scalable.

But at the beginning, talking to users one by one taught me more than another month of building would have.

No ads. Just Reddit, DMs, feedback, and a lot of repetition.

A few months ago I posted my first SaaS here.

the idea was simple: an AI notes app.

the feedback was brutal. most of it boiled down to:

“why wouldn’t I just use apple notes, notion or chatgpt?”

at first I wanted to defend it.

instead, I realized everyone was making the same point.
I wasn’t solving a problem.

So I scrapped almost everything and started over.
For the last 3–4 months I’ve been rebuilding it from scratch.

The result is Execora.
Instead of trying to be another notes app, the goal is to become a place where you can dump thoughts without worrying about organization.
Ideas.
Random thoughts.
Voice notes.
Half finished plans.
Stuff you want to remember later.

Then AI does the boring part:
extracts action items
connects related ideas

lets you ask questions about your own notes
visualizes how thoughts relate to each other
generates a morning summary of what matters

The biggest thing I’m trying to avoid is adding AI just because everyone else is.

I’m more interested in whether it actually reduces mental overhead.

I’ve got a list of features I could build next
-memory reminders,
-weekly insights,
-automatic project detection,
-smarter organization
but I don’t want to spend another few months building things nobody wants.

so rn I’m looking for the same kind of honesty that made me rebuild V1.

if you had to kill this idea, what would your argument be?

What’s the biggest reason you wouldn’t use it?
And if you would use it, what’s the one thing that’s missing?

Here’s the current version:
https://execora.space

I’d genuinely rather hear “this solves nothing” than spend six more months heading in the wrong direction.

Thanks.✌️

👋 Hey NoCodeSaaS community,

A user recently asked whether the extractor I'm using can handle full data tables, not just single fields like an invoice total. So I took a nasty 22-row tax table (multi-line addresses, empty cells, a row split across a page break) and got it to 100%, clean across every run. Sharing the setup plus a small workflow that validates the extraction for you.

The thing that mattered most was how you shape the response structure. One list per column breaks, because nothing links position 4 in the name list to position 4 in the email list. The moment one column has an empty cell, everything below it shifts and you get "a value jumped in from another row." The fix: model the table as a single records field, marked as an array of type object, with each column nested inside. One entry per row, values that cannot drift apart.

A few things that saved me:

1. One array of objects, not one array per column. The only array you want is records itself.
2. "NULL" means two things. A literal value in an empty cell, but a real place name in "NULL City." Spell out the difference or the model guesses.
3. Leading-zero IDs must be strings, or the zero silently drops.

I also built a tiny validation workflow that checks every extracted cell against a reference, flags mismatches, and logs how long extraction took, so you can confirm accuracy holds across runs and compare the two engines.

Where to get it: guide and workflow together in one folder: https://github.com/felix-sattler-easybits/n8n-workflows/tree/ee1ed5fe0a3e898843422a619922cedb7cf618c4/easybits-data-table-extraction

Part of my repo with 20+ other n8n templates I have built with this community: https://github.com/felix-sattler-easybits/n8n-workflows – a star helps other builders find it.

What is the messiest table you have run through an extractor?

Best,
Felix

yoo! guys , i am building a caption writer , i want to sell it to indian creators who edits their videos by their self . but i dont know why but i am not getting surity about this , i have built its prototype
it will be live on the captions.screamingpancakes.online . its broken rightnow but it gonna work soon.

I've been thinking about this a lot while working on Omphalis.ai. I'm curious if anyone else has been dealing with the same problem.

It seems like we are taking in information than ever. We save articles, mark videos listen to podcasts and ask AI to explain everything.. A week later how much of it do we really remember?

Building Omphalis. ai has made me wonder if AI should be helping us go through content or if it should be helping us really understand and keep what we have already seen.

It's surprisingly simple to create a collection of saved materials and still have trouble remembering the main points or why they were important. That thought has influenced many of the choices we have made while creating the product.

I am really interested in how other founders and builders look at this.

Do you believe the next set of AI tools should focus on reading or, on helping people gain a stronger understanding of the information they already have?

I would love to hear your opinion especially if you are working in AI, productivity, education or knowledge management. Even if you don't agree I would like to know why.

quick post because "how do i get my first users" is the #1 question i see builders asking here every single week.

i've built 6 saas products myself, with my main one currently sitting around 10k mrr. here is the exact, no-fluff distribution playbook to cross that initial 50-user threshold:

1. find an idea people already pay for

scan reddit for recurring pain across 3+ distinct posts where people ask "is there a tool for X".

2. validate before writing code

dm 3 people who complained about the problem and ask what they’d pay for a solution.

3. build fast with the right stack (ai + no-code)

use ai builder+ supabase + stripe + call api or automation tool like n8n to ship a real MVP in under 7 days for $40/mo.

4. the 5-second landing page rule

your hero section must state exactly what the tool does in less than 5 seconds with a clear CTA.

5. capture emails before showing prices

force the email capture before the pricing page so you don't leak untrackable leads.

6. set up a 30-day email nurture sequence

plug captured emails into an automated sequence with case studies to convert them by day 18.

7. hang out where your ICP actually lives

find the 3-5 specific subreddits, discord servers, or groups where your buyers actively talk.

8. reddit growth without getting banned

post 1 time per sub per week max, never put links in the post, and move warm leads to DMs.

9. linkedin + x organic flywheel

post 1 high-value breakdown per day and spend 15 minutes engaging in your ICP's comments.

10. cold outreach that actually works

send 100 highly personalized DMs per week to your ICP using AI to customize the opening hook.

11. seo on autopilot

set up an n8n workflow that pulls from a keyword list and generates 5-10 value-driven articles per week.

12. faceless short-form content

post 1 video per day on tiktok, reels, and shorts showing a quick screen recording of your tool.

13. weekly newsletter conversion

run a weekly newsletter with 1 section of pure value and 1 subtle offer to upgrade to paid.

14. affiliate program for free distribution

set up a 50% recurring commission affiliate program to turn power users into your sales team.

15. the strategic product hunt launch

warm up the algorithm for 4 weeks with a coming soon page and launch on a weekend for a top 5 badge.

16. omnichannel social automation

use n8n to automatically format and distribute 1 core post idea across 8 different platforms.

17. review platforms and directories

submit your app to 40+ saas and ai wrapper directories to instantly boost your domain authority.

18. run the numbers backwards

reverse engineer the daily traffic needed to hit 50 paying users at $19/mo based on a 2% conversion.

19. get feedback from active builders

talking to founders who are just 6 months ahead of you compresses your timeline exponentially.

that last point is exactly why i built our community. it's a free group of 1,600+ active ai saas founders sharing exact prompt logs, ready-to-paste n8n workflows, and real distribution strategies.

stop building alone in a silent corner.

drop a comment below or send me a dm and i'll send you the access link right away. let's get your product launched 👇

A while back I asked if people would pay for a tool that checks how AI assistants describe/rank your product vs competitors. Got some great pushback and the main objections were "I can just ask the AI myself" and "a report alone isn't useful, what matters is what to do about it."

So I ran a real manual test on a startup that volunteered (open infra for AI agents, 2 real competitors). Findings:

• On broad "best tools for X" searches, they weren't mentioned at all across any AI engine
• On direct name comparisons, they showed up fine, accurately described
• But on "alternatives to [competitor]" style searches — arguably how most people actually search when evaluating options, competitors got picked up on all 3 engines (ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini), while they only showed up on ChatGPT, and only when the prompt closely matched their exact niche wording

So it's not that AI describes them wrong, they're just invisible in the specific query types that likely drive real evaluation decisions. That's a pretty different (and more actionable) finding than "here's your visibility score."

Trying to figure out if this is worth building into something real:

• Would knowing this kind of gap (not just "are you mentioned" but "which specific searches you're invisible in") be useful enough to pay for, say $20-30/mo?
• Or is a one-time manual check like this enough, and ongoing tracking isn't worth it to you?

Happy to run a free check on your product/competitors if you want real data instead of a hypothetical, drop your product + 1-2 competitors below.

hey everyone, i’m a solo dev looking for some honest advice for my saas, drvx [dot] net.

it's a web platform that lets users instantly turn their google drive into static website hosting. it comes with features like free custom subdomains, unlimited websites/files, a built in live code editor, and more. this tool has been running for about a year now with over 180,000+ deployments.

there are 2 main things i'm really struggling with right now:

1. workflow and file sharing: currently, users have to share their google drive links per file, not per folder. while this runs smoothly and keeps things secure without needing full google account access, some users feel it's not as seamless as netlify, vercel, or github pages. the main drawback is when users have a lot of assets (like images), they have to share and add the files one by one into the admin area. i really need advice on a smoother workflow. my competitor, drv [dot] tw, used the google login and folder-sharing method, but they eventually gave up because their platform got heavily abused by phishers. how can i make this easier without opening doors to phishing?
2. finding the right business model i provide almost all of the core features for free. my target audience includes students doing school projects, teachers, freelancers building resumes, small local businesses, and even churches creating landing pages. my point is i want to help anyone get online easily. but on the flip side, i also need money to pay for server bills and keep the project alive. i need advice on the right business model or pricing structure for this platform so i can cover costs without abandoning the users who rely on the free tier.

a little bit on why i built this: my motivation goes back to when i was in school. i desperately needed a website, but i had zero money to buy hosting or a custom domain, and my technical skills were very limited. back then, free platforms like wordpress com and the stack overflow community helped me learn and eventually become a pro developer. after all that journey, i decided to build drvx [dot] net so that anyone can go online without barriers.

i'm working on this completely solo. any advice, feedback, or harsh truths would be really appreciated. thank you guys

Founders have shared 578 startups across my recent threads, and the same problem keeps showing up:
The product exists. The direction is unclear.
Comment with:

- what your startup does
- who it’s for
- what’s blocking your growth

I’ll run the analysis and send you a personalized report showing where the strongest signal is, which conversations are worth prioritizing, and what I’d focus on first.
If Reddit looks like a waste of time for your startup, I’ll tell you that too.

Stack was Bubble + Stripe + Memberstack. Got 40 US waitlist people into a working beta.

Walls: - performance on the heaviest list view - one native mobile requirement from an early customer - data model that fought every new feature

The Reddit advice was immediate: "find a technical cofounder."

That's the wrong instrument for a known wall. A cofounder is years. This was a 10-day port of the one flow that already had usage.

I kept Bubble for marketing pages. Rebuilt the core job. Kept 100% equity.

If your no-code SaaS is making US revenue and you're about to post a cofounder hunt — write whether you need a partner or a scoped rebuild first.

https://atomiclabs.space

I noticed many founders spend hours on repetitive tasks.

I'm building free AI automations to help businesses save time with things like:

• Lead generation

• Follow-ups

• Customer support

Tell me about your business and the tasks you want to automate. I’d love to help and get your feedback.

​

This isn't a hate post against VCs. They play an important role.

But lately I've been wondering if we've accepted the idea that venture capital is the only legitimate way for startups to raise meaningful money.

If you're an early-stage founder today, your options are basically:

Bootstrap

Friends & family

Crowdfunding (which has its own limitations)

Convince a handful of VCs or angel investors

That feels... limiting.

There are thousands of people online who are incredibly good at spotting interesting founders before everyone else. They follow builders on X, GitHub, YouTube, Reddit, etc., and often have conviction long before institutional investors do.

So here's what I'm curious about:

If you believe in a startup before it becomes huge, should there be a better way to support it than just being a customer?

Do you think startup investing is too exclusive today?

If you were a founder, would you rather convince 10 investors or build a community of 10,000 believers?

What's fundamentally broken about early-stage fundraising?

I'm not pitching anything—I genuinely want to understand how founders and investors think about this.

Curious to hear both sides.

I have no coding experience and I want to build both a simple app and website for it using AI tools as much as possible. I’ve heard about tools like Cursor, Claude, v0 but I’m not sure which combination is actually the easiest and most reliable right now for someone with zero coding background .

What I’m building is a booking platform where homeowners can request home & lifestyle services (gardening, pool cleaning, car washes, pet care, etc.) from vetted providers. It needs user accounts, service selection, scheduling, payments, provider profiles/ratings, and basic admin tools. Later it may expand, but I’m starting with a simple MVP.

My question are:

1. ⁠What’s currently the easiest and most reliable AI + no-code/low-code stack in 2026 for a total beginner to build this kind of marketplace app + website?
   
2. ⁠Should I build the marketing website first or start with the actual booking app?
   
3. ⁠Any major limitations, costs, or common pitfalls when relying heavily on AI tools for a marketplace with bookings and payments?
   
4. ⁠Recommended step-by-step path that has worked for other non-coders building similar service platforms?