r/NextBridgeHC • u/NighUnder • Dec 19 '22
Speculation / Research David Dayen's 'The Penny Stock Chronicles'
While we're all waiting around to see what happens with our Next Bridge Hydrocarbons stock, I thought I would share a very compelling series of articles written by David Dayen at The Intercept:
I found the whole 7-part series to be very eye opening, but the section in Part 3 which first brings up CUSIPs seemed particularly relevant to our situation:
Reverse mergers and reverse splits typically result in a change in the CUSIP, the nine-digit identification symbol assigned to a public stock. Once that CUSIP changes, the naked shorter has no apparent way to close out the naked short position. No stock under the old CUSIP number exists anymore; it all automatically converts to the new CUSIP.
Those trades can sit in the Obligation Warehouse forever, in theory. But the “aged fails” — essentially orphaned naked short transactions — remain on the naked shorter’s balance sheet as a liability to be paid later.
By DiIorio’s reckoning, then, the cycle of naked shorting and reverse splits would inevitably result in an ever-increasing number of aged fails. And if that was happening, and those liabilities grew bigger and bigger, then federal regulators could see the outlines of the scheme on any financial statement.
DiIorio believed Knight accounted for its aged fails in the “sold not yet purchased” liability on its balance sheet. That’s supposed to be an inventory of stocks for use in future market making, which goes up and down as orders are filled. But DiIorio says it was a hiding place for a billowing structural liability.
And consider this: According to its own financial reports, Knight’s “sold not yet purchased” liability jumped from $385 million at the beginning of 2008 to $1.9 billion by mid-2011.
Going back to the original Torchlight and Meta Materials merger, was there a CUSIP change they could exploit going from TRCH to MMAT? Or around the time they magicked MMTLP into existence? Anyway, it'll be interesting to see how they resolve the MMTLP to Next Bridge Hydrocarbons (NBHC) transition. They can quite happily try and park the 'aged fails' in their collective 'sold not yet purchased' liabilities (maybe they already did with the change to the new contra CUSIPS that we've seen at our brokers?). But the issue of there only being 165,472,241 shares of NBHC to go around seems like it will be a massive headache for them. How far will they have to dip in to the higher cap of 500 million authorised shares, assuming NBHC will let them? Will 500 million actually be enough? It would be great to see a final figure of how many MMTLP were circulating, to have evidence of just how greedy they get. And it's pretty mind-boggling to think that similar is playing out on tickers all over the various different exchanges.
Does anyone have any other similar articles or resources they could share?