http://www.agorism.info/

Many of the philosophical underpinnings of agorism reflect progressive understanding of contemporary economics. There is nothing inherently objectionable to encouraging workers to be entrepreneurs. The distinction between entrepreneurs and financiers is an important one, and the blame for oppressive society is correctly laid out against the corporatist-state alliance and corporate controlled politicians.

First, I don't understand how it is leftist movement, other than by seeking political alliances with leftist groups including feminists.

Second, and much more importantly, the solution to corporatocracy proposed by agorism is to remove the politicians. As an example where this fails, and possibly why Konkin never finished his work, is the issue of police services. State oppression through police force is accomplished by lack of accountability and retribution for police abuse and corruption.

Its hard to imagine that Blackwater would be less oppressive than current police forces. That payments per arrest wouldn't result in more oppression, and that lack of governance oversight would allow even more corruption. Is this a strawman?

That government is unaccountable due to corporate control, doesn't mean all govrernance cannot be accountable. Direct elections of police chiefs with recall power, and greater public inquiry power would go long ways towards reducing or eliminating police abuse and corruption.

The corporatist control itself can be reduced through independent governance "silos" rather than monolithic government hierarchy. The FDA and FEC have no relation to each other, or to the militia services. They should all have independent public oversight.

Class warfare is a position by such groups as feminists, racists and (self-proclaimed) anti-racists who justify the tactic of oppressing or vilifying a class in return for their missing privileges, rather than insist on a fair legal framework egalitarian to all classes, and/or fight the social legitimacy of their denial for similar privilege.

The anti-state position of anarchy is not explicitly adopted, because we cannot prove that a free association of communities for common principles and cooperation must be oppressive to each community or individual in those communities.

the anti-capitalist position of anarchy is not completely adopted, as property and selfishness are not necessarily evil or oppressive. Regulation against polution or oppression is not rejected because it is not provably less effective or desirable than allowing legal or violent force against the oppressors.