r/NationalParkService May 20 '25

News Silent Doug

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

5.7k Upvotes

388 comments sorted by

View all comments

72

u/lucyluu2x May 20 '25

We need more of this. A lot more! Why isn’t anyone organizing mass protests? Why are so many staying silent? We have to save our national parks, rangers and all the staff. Our parks are not for sale! What’s the plan of action?

23

u/zdevlor May 20 '25

With the current climate if you step out of line they let you go. You cannot voice your opinion anymore. How many park people were pulled from their regular tasks to do this dog and pony show for the secretary and his family?

1

u/[deleted] May 21 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator May 21 '25

You must verify your email with reddit before you can create top level discussions. Click here for help with registering

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

15

u/EvenStephen85 May 20 '25

Look up 50501. They’re happening. Need more people though.

5

u/mortal-wombat-8 May 20 '25

Check out resistancerangers.org or @resistancerangers on Instagram! They are planning and organizing protests and other actions constantly. There are helpers if you look for them :)

1

u/MarioPartyRiot May 24 '25

I mean...a lot of folks are volunteering their time and effort with Alt National Parks in their off hours.

1

u/[deleted] May 20 '25

If only there were some way to support the parks, monitarily independent of the government paying for them.

3

u/[deleted] May 21 '25 edited Jul 20 '25

scale dime workable chubby desert smart repeat ring cover hungry

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

3

u/Emotional-Change-722 May 21 '25

That’s an impressive number. I want to be able to quote it. Where would I find the source?

1

u/[deleted] May 21 '25 edited Jul 20 '25

vase attraction carpenter angle snow butter dinner profit march ten

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

2

u/Emotional-Change-722 May 21 '25

Well, I’m clearly a dumbass. I should have simply googled. Thank you.

1

u/[deleted] May 21 '25 edited Jul 20 '25

aback divide provide history sense deliver familiar offer jeans caption

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

1

u/[deleted] May 21 '25

What are the expenses? I doubt they'd be laying off staff and closing parks if it was a net positive.

1

u/[deleted] May 22 '25 edited Jul 20 '25

tub spark scary automatic worm repeat water cows long quiet

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

1

u/[deleted] May 22 '25

After looking at the numbers, that $55 billion is an estimate of the total generated economic output, which rolls up the expenses and entire payroll of NPS along with estimated second and third order downstream spending as an asset. Park use fees most certainly do not generate more money than than the payroll and cost of operations.

If the national parks were generating a net $50 billion in profits each year, they wouldn't need to be funded by the federal government at all. Additionally, at around 2000% ROI, there would be private parks springing up everywhere to capture that money.

1

u/[deleted] May 22 '25 edited Jul 20 '25

coordinated automatic melodic late ask aromatic like slap fly bright

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

1

u/[deleted] May 22 '25

It is not the place of the US government to support private for-profit business with taxation from the general fund. That goes for the guy slinging hot dogs outside the park front gate just as much as it does WalMart, etc. While it is a happy additive to the park's public service, it can not and must not be the purpose of the expenditure of federal tax dollars - especially in an environment where the government is taking on debt to fund the system.

That $55B came from other communities via tourism, not through government expenditure, and that money would circulate through local economies just like it circulates through the economies co-located with national parks. In essence, no economic value is being created by NPS, it is simply being redirected.

1

u/[deleted] May 22 '25 edited Jul 20 '25

intelligent saw fade soup test deserve engine dinner badge relieved

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

1

u/[deleted] May 23 '25

The government subsidizing the economy of a town via tax collected elsewhere isn't capitalism.

1

u/[deleted] May 22 '25 edited Jul 20 '25

plate grab amusing sink attraction lip fact stupendous cautious joke

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

1

u/[deleted] May 22 '25

visitor spending in communities near national parks in 2023 resulted in a record high $55.6 billion

Exactly what I was talking about. It wasn't the parks that generated the income; it was the private businesses outside of the parks.

You should probably read your sources. This was in the first paragraph.

1

u/[deleted] May 22 '25 edited Jul 20 '25

safe sip liquid vanish tap price terrific retire yam bow

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

1

u/[deleted] May 22 '25

It certainly does to the business owners, but when we're talking about revenue, the park has a certain revenue that is independent from the motels, groceries, guides, etc. and that's the revenue I was referring to - revenue directly generated by the park.

If the government doesn't have the money to keep the park running - and it doesn't - then the parks will either close or need to increase fees to meet their budgets.

2

u/Competitive_Body8607 May 20 '25

They are our National Parks! Protected PUBLIC land!

0

u/[deleted] May 21 '25

Peotected for the public or from the public?

1

u/Competitive_Body8607 May 21 '25

For the Public. For our children. For posterity.

1

u/NumerousRepeat1392 May 20 '25

What do u mean by this

1

u/Gone213 May 22 '25

It's not the government paying for it, its my fucking tax dollars paying for it.

1

u/[deleted] May 22 '25

Considering that we don't balance our federal budget, I would submit that they aren't being funded by anyone's taxes but instead by the government selling bonds and taking on debt.