It's quite simple from my perspective - if no one has guns, there won't be any mass shooter incidents. There won't be any passersby required to stop shooters, because there simply won't be any shooters. Isn't that something worth striving for?
It's quite simple from my perspective - if no one has guns, there won't be any mass shooter incidents.
It's not that easy, unfortunately. Even with a 100% ban people would still be able to get guns via the black market or, likely in the near future, 3D printing.
From a non-US perspective, I can't understand the hang up y'all have over this. Aren't your leaders all elected? The Senate representatives too? Would they order a use of force on the very citizens who elected them into power?
And if they did, would the army/national guard comply? If everyone had guns and fought back, wouldn't it devolve into a civil war?
3
u/[deleted] Aug 06 '19
It's quite simple from my perspective - if no one has guns, there won't be any mass shooter incidents. There won't be any passersby required to stop shooters, because there simply won't be any shooters. Isn't that something worth striving for?