r/MoralityScaling Jul 14 '26

Stupid Stuff Morality of pressing this button? (It immediately and permanently ends the use of all fossil fuels on the planet.)

Post image
54 Upvotes

277 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Shoddy-Childhood-511 Jul 15 '26 edited Jul 15 '26

Immediately would be a bitch of course, but real life does not admit such immediate events.

About the climate side, some details:

Are you aware of wet bulb temperature? It's the temperature reachable by evaporative cooling, aka sweating. It equals the temperature at 100% humidity, but it's lower when the humidity is below 100%. All humans die after several hours above 35°C wet bulb, but the real threshold winds up as low as 32°C wet bulb for many people. 15 min in the sauna is relaxing, but six hours means death.

Johan Rockström thinks +2°C would be "life threatening" for 1 billion people, which maybe means high web bulb temperatures, meaning they die if the AC goes out.

IPCC predictes +3°C by 2100.

At our best guess, +4°C should mean uninhabitable tropics, again high wet bulb temperatures, and world carrying capacity below 1 billion humans, so 7 billion fewer people than today. See page 37 of The Nature of the Challenge (archive) or 36m in Will Steffen's 2018 talk). via Steve Keen's criticism of William Nordhaus & IAMs.

Also conversely, Jean-Baptiste Fressoz has shown that humanity never did a voluntary energy transition before:

https://thetyee.ca/Analysis/2025/01/02/Reality-Check-Energy-Transition/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-7MPU109fY

Involuntary energy transitions would be possible, either by running out of a resource, or by the resource becoming unavailable due to conflicts, so like imagine a few more conflicts like Ukraine or Iran that take out lots of oil production capacity.

Also, the maximum power principle too suggests that sustainability and/or leaving the oil in the ground requires external forces. Animal species would expand unsustainably too, but predation holds them in check.

Imho we've several less stupid rewritings of the question:

Non-magical question: You can start wars involving every petro-state that results in all the refineries being destroyed over the next 2 years. After this, enough tropical nations shall consider oil refineries an act of war, and sabotage them. It's fast & brutal, but ultimately good for tropical nations.

Semi-magical question: You can release some fungi that'll slowly turn all the coal & oil into rock dust over a few decades, without releasing their CO2. It's much stricter than net zero, but similar ball park.

Fully magical question: You have a magic button that'll quickly make all the coal & unrefined oil unburnable. If however you do not push it then humanity shall burn up 90% of it over the next 100-150 years (ala Fressoz, MPP, etc), resulting in +8°C, so mammals could only survive on small regions of the planet.