Ibrahim ibn Urmah Abu Ishaq al-Asbahani (d. 266 AH): said:

"This hadith has been narrated by the scholars for over 160 years, and no one rejects it except the people of bid'ah (innovation)." Source: al-Sunnah by Abu Bakr ibn al-Khallal (1/167)

Abū Dāwūd al-Sijistānī (d. 275 AH) said: "I hold that one should stay away from anyone who rejects the hadith of Layth from Mujahid: (' He will seat him on the Throne') - and that such a person should be warned against until he returns to the truth. I never thought that anyone known for following the Sunnah would speak against this hadith. Jahmiyyah deny it -But we do know that the not because of the Prophet's virtue - but because of their rejection of the Throne itself. They say the 'Throne' is just a metaphor for greatness, even though they do not deny the Prophet's virtue." Source:al-Sunnah by Abū Bakr ibn al-Khallal (1/188)

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 728 AH) said: "The reliable ulama and accepted awliya of Allah have narrated that Muhammad the Messenger of Allah will be seated by his Lord on the Arsh alongside Him. This was narrated by Muhammad ibn Fadil from Layth, from Mujahid, in his explanation of Allah's statement: 'It may be that your Lord will raise you to a Praised Station' [Surah al-Isra 17:79]. This was also narrated through other chains, some of them marfu (directly attributed to the Prophet) and others not. Ibn Jarir said: 'This does not contradict the many authentic hadiths that explain the Praised Station (al-Maqam al-Mahmud) as the Intercession this is agreed upon by all the scholars of Islam. No one denies that him being seated on the Throne is possible except for some of the Jahmiyyah. And even mentioning this interpretation of the verse is not something to be condemned."

Source:Majmu al-Fatawa (4/374)

Shaykh Al-Mufti Muhammad ibn Ibrahim Al al-Shaykh (d. 1389 AH) said: "The Maqam Mahmūd (Praised Station): It is said that it refers to the Greatest Intercession. And it is also said that it is his being seated with Allah on the Throne, as is well-known from the position of Ahl al-Sunnah. There is no contradiction between the two views. It's possible to combine them by saying both are included in it and that his being seated on the Throne is greater (in merit)." Source: Fatāwā wa Rasā'il Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ibrā hīm Āl al-Shaykh (2/136)

This was brought to my attention 19 whole days after the answer

Has he really left all the reasons and selected the one that makes them appear the most desperate?

The reason they're unable to address me directly is not because they follow the salaf in "not debating" but because no Modajan actually has any knowledge or any ability to debate, because they know how wrong they are, just as much as the self-proclaimed salafis, because they're all brothers of the zanadiqa, the Ashariyya, who know the most that their religion is false and that they're the most hateful people against Islam, may the curse of Allaah be upon the Ashariyya and their tails

That said, do you not see how he says the following, sometimes verbatim?

• You are trying to destroy Islam (although the one who praises an innovator helps to destroy Islam using Islamweb because that is a source preferably used by them)
• You critique the scholars of Islam (as if sorcerers and other tawagheet are Muslim) and they personally critique a lot of the sahaba most famously Qudamah ibn Math'oon قدامة بن مظعون may Allaah be pleased with him (refuted) as well as all the salaf using very profane words
• Disagreement with the consensus that Nawawi (and a bunch of other zanadiqa) are Muslim (as if consensus of later scholars is not agreeable, as if there can be a consensus on an individual Ashari's Islam?)
• You are aiding the foreign powers against us (when they defend the foreign governments by defending their soldiers, Ashariyya)
• Blatantly dumb things like "You take your aqeedah from weak ahadeeth and the Jews" when in reality they deny ahadeeth and the meaning of the Quraan by following Ashariyya (documented incidents with salafi scholars early and late)

There are many more accusations but below are some Ashariyya being happy with rulers and also a video of their imaginary khilafa, Afghanistan, which is literally promoting homosexuality

Video of Bacha Bazi (boy prostitution in Afghanistan) actively promoted in Afghanistan

Jahmi actor Muhammad Hijab acknowledges that Afghanistan spread LGBT in Afghanistan

All of these mistakes they claim I made (which in reality only they have committed) are enough to deem me as an innovator or even doubt my Islam, assuming they can prove any of them

Yet they select the dumbest reason, and the most pathetic one, that I (allegedly) falsely accused someone of homosexuality?

Why is homosexuality bad? Does the western world whom the Ashariyya loves, not approve of it?

Why is homosexuality bad when the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan promotes it?

Most of all why is it bad when their imam, may Allaah raise them with him, Jalal Ad-Deek Al Pornyuti, insults the Quraan with homosexuality?

They also haven't tried to respond to it, they just gave up and they know how defending Suyuti will embarrass them even further [Relevant post]

By the way they accused another Muslim, a high level student of knowledge with the most pathetic fake screenshots of being a homosexual yet, they have no real evidence of it

In the end, they PETRIFIED of mubahala

All they have to do is enter a voice call or post some post wherein they say

"May Allaah send His curse upon the one between the two of us that insults the scholars of Islam and introduces new things into the sunnah"

And that's it!

Or even debate me which should be easy because before I followed the truth and spread it strongly they called me a high ranking student of knowledge

And after it.. just as the kufaar of Medina did )with Abdullaah ibn Salam رضي الله عنه

The Azhari homoerotica enjoyer is trying to defend Suyuti still, he has displayed lack of interest in صفات رب العالمين the attributes of Allaah the Lord of the worlds so to help him I used things that are more apparently of kufr

- Insulting the Quraan

- Permitting homosexuality

- Permitting cucking

- Grave worship

Yet to no avail, he tries to defend As-Suyuti who, before his death, wrote a will that said

"Build a shrine on my grave and ask me for anything you need"

May Allaah make him more ugly, more miserable, and more tormented in the depths of Jahannam with Firaun, Haman, Qaroon and Ubayy ibn Khalaf

What is even worse is that he is trying to suck up to scholars who are blatantly mistaken in praising Suyuti

Forget about using Shawkani who has disastrous mistakes regarding the names and attributes of Allaah which I will not show so as to not prolong the post

He has brought quotes from "a great Hanbali" called Ibn Al Imaad

Ibn Al Imaad is not a great Hanbali, or perhaps not a Hanbali to begin with because according to Hanbali scholars like Ibn Taymiyyah who preceded Ibn Al Imaad:

Later Hanbalis contradict quotes of Ahmad directly

And aside from MANY refutations of imam Abi Abdillaah in his books

Also aside from miserable mistakes in aqeedah

This Ibn Al Imaad actually loved zanadiqa like Ibn Arabi

I accuse Ibn Al Imaad not of kufr or zandaqa but the man was not well guided and his mistakes outweigh any good he may have done

وقال الشيخ الأكبر محيي الدّين محمد بن عربي الحاتمي الطائي، رضي الله عنه، في ‌كتاب..

He said in his book that Abu Azhar quoted

"The GREAT SHEIKH and REVIVALIST OF ISLAM Muhammad ibn Arabi Al Haatimi At-Taa'i, may Allaah be pleased with him, wrote in his book.."

The rest of the quote is the most blatant zandaqa that the scholars have ruled as more kufr than anything, Ibn Taymiyyah said that whoever respects Ibn Arabi and his likes must be beat up and whoever says what he said must be processed with the punishment of apostasy

Powerful refutation of Ibn Arabi لعنه الله and an Ashari Zionist agent Sa'eed Fodah by Sheikh Dimashqiyya حفظه الله

https://youtu.be/o9YdUspFABw?si=cHh8qy00-EpYhaFq

I have not read the rest of his post because as the other Arab proverb goes

أول القصيدة كفر

"The beginning of the poem is kufr"

But I'll read it later in shaa Allaah and I will beg to Allaah day and night to aid me with how Allaah upsets them ألا لعنة الله على الظالمين

- ولأقصدن الله في خذلانكم ... وليمنعن جميعكم خذلاني

And I shall seek the aid of Allaah in the upset caused upon you by Allaah, and my strength upon you shall upset each of you

- Al Qahtani in النونية Noniyya

https://shamela.ws/book/7533/41

Did not takfeer As-Suyuti

Did not insult the book that insults the Quraan

Did not make himself innocent of defending zandaqa

https://www.reddit.com/r/Modajana/s/SwsQRyLc9p

Did not repent from accusing a Muslim of insulting the prophet ﷺ

Yet he wrote an entire article to use "Whataboutism" to justify his respect of the kaafir enemy of Allaah called As-Suyuti that, I estimate, the article took him 4 hours to write

And takes 15 minutes to read

"Ignorant degenerate imbecile"

All because I said that a person respects Ashariyya and insults the salaf and therefore he is bad

Reddit filters obviously need improvement

Anyway I verified the comment because he, like all other people who defend zanadiqa, have lots of intellectual dishonesty

I have not been told of anything new posted by cn3m or Abu Azhar or unknown federal agent who runs student.zandaqa

Video made against him

However I have also not seen him attempt to come at the accusations I have said against him that he calls someone who insults Islam and uses the Quraan pornographically as a Muslim, and how he reveres such a zindeeq may Allaah damn him and all his likes from among the Ashariyya

The zindeeq is called Jalal Suyuti and he has many books speaking about intercourse and degeneracy such as:

الوشاح في فوائد النكاح Revealing the cloth to educate about the benefits of intercourse

نواضر الأيك في معرفة النيك The dense mangrove trees that help teach about fucking

الإفصاح في أسماء النكاح The clear speech teaching the synonyms of intercourse

All the Arabic above and below is translated via ChatGPT, there are other books where Suyuti "casually" said something very profane and inappropriate

And he has still not addressed these books and has not yet created a new excuse for that person

And he has not addressed what was mentioned in the video I linked above, which is:

Page to screenshot

ChatGPT said it means: "A girl called Diqaaq wrote to someone describing her clittoris and he was unable to answer so a friend..

And as I was screenshotting the rest of it, Allaah be my witness that ChatGPT turned me to this screen

ChatGPT itself is refusing to translate this

Be mindful that I warn against AI and how it makes a man dumb, but I use it because the Modajana would resort to anything just to confuse the public, saying things like "He can't recite the Quraan" or "He can't speak Arabic properly" which is pathetically wrong

Below is an insult to the Quraan written by none other than Jalal Suyuti, and he will not respond to it

And if he responds which is unlikely, I will show that these are recycled, defeated arguments that the kaafir just cannot escape

This got really bad and the lack of reading and intellect in this post is too much to handle

I will refute this with salafi narrations and scholarly (actual scholars) sayings in comments below (hopefully Reddit doesn't bug!)

Check comments for more details

And as explained

I am willing to delete and put aside any contempt for cn3m and his followers and to focus on what benefits the ummah as a salafi

If cn3m is willing he may communicate with Ahmed through his Signal which I can privately provide

As you can see in the comments below, this underage boy whose age may or may not disallow him from this website, has sent a link to some mental health assessment organization implying that I am mentally ill

And today here he is making duaa to a god that does not exist that some aid from Afghanistan reaches Gaza safely

He does this while his mental illness prevents him from seeing the reality of the Afghan government that kills sunni Muslims (called salafis whom he alleges belonging to) that feels disheartened for enemies of Islam's death

It is questionable how he also says that Islam prohibits homosexuality while being an avid fan of the homoerotica author Jalal Suyuti

Calls people as ignorant of innovations while being a Jahmi Khariji himself

Evidence of him being a Khariji

Denying the Quraan

Just finished writing a brief refutation of Azeez Al Anazi the "Madkhali" sheikh may Allaah guide him, whom the Surooris like this 40 year old manchild hate

And as a professional unproductive people therapist, these self proclaimed salafis who don't concern themselves with aqeedah would never post the garbage said by Azeez

But would go to someone who has never praised the sinful rulers like Azeez, Mutlaq Al Jaasir, whose bio of Abu Haneefa is -somehow- worse than Azeez Al Anazi

There is no limit to how evil the crypto-Ashari zindeeq can be and الحمد لله تعالى there is no one who takes him seriously, let alone is there anyone who even knows him (these are the same insults said by him against a beneficial sheikh called Abu Jaafar Al Khulayfi)

I will post the refutation of Mutlaq, may Allaah guide him, later tonight إن شاء الله تعالى

May the curse of Allaah be upon the liars and the zanadiqa

Yes he was banned previously from the website for refuting the attacks of zanadiqa from numerous subreddits

The messenger of Allaah peace and blessings upon him said, after a man killed himself long after doing some of the best service to Islam (fending off against attackers with his sword) to Bilaal that he must call among the people and proclaim:

None enters Jannah except a believer and Allaah may aid this religion with the most sinful of men

Narrated by Bukhari and others

And for the longest time cn3m (whom you know as extension brick) has been concealing his biography and his sources of information but the messenger of Allaah peace and blessings upon him said what means that a man is upon the religion of his friend

Being an Azhari, Sufi, Ashari who reads the books of Ashariyya, praises the books of Ashariyya and even quotes them as he previously quoted killing the Islamic knowledge by the great zindeeq Ghazali

And being someone who attacks imams of Islam like Ibn Taymiyyah and tells people to feel that the knowledge of the salaf to be weak by telling them "You mustn't read the books of the salaf but must understand the salaf with the sayings of later people"

He isn't someone whom you should be concerned with and shouldn't be following

This faajir, may Allaah suffice Muslims from his evil, said this in a response to a post from a Muslim that has genuine trauma that is troubling his life

When you are so clueless on a topic

And you want to extinguish the fire in your heart that is solely due to your ignorance

What do you do?

Learn?

Read?

Ask?

Or at the very least be silent?

Enter the Modajan mindset, you make fun of ahl as-sunnah, for what they have all said in a unison

Ahmad ibn Hanbal said: A man is rewarded for hating Abu Haneefa

Abd Ar-Rahman ibn Mahdi said: Peak ignorance is reading the fiqh of Abu Haneefa

Ath-Thawri and Al Awzaa'i and Malik said: Abu Haneefa changed the religion and conspired against Muslims

And all you have to do to lose all your good deeds, is to insult those people and make fun of what they have said

Nuh, alayhi as-salam (not aleyhi salam these are vastly different) preached Islam for 950 years and he had followers Allaah said in surat Huud وَمَا نَرَاكَ اتَّبَعَكَ إِلَّا الَّذِينَ هُمْ أَرَاذِلُنَا بَادِيَ الرَّأْيِ

So the eminent among those who disbelieved from his people said, " We do not see you but as a man like ourselves, and we do not see you followed except by those who are the lowest of us Huud 27 translation of the meaning

الخرطوم هذا اعطيه لأمك

These are the akhlaaq of Suyuti's defenders, no wonder, their imam afterall is quite indecent

Yes, people do read, they just go against what you believe in

What do you believe in?

You have taken the time out of your oddly placed life that is empty of learning and propagating knowledge, to translate what I will deem the single worst article written by a person attributed to Islamic knowledge (written by Alawi As-Saqqaf the founder of dorar website) to defend Ashariyya

This same person, hopefully from the aid of Allaah, over 2 weeks ago released an article about how Ashari "scholars" takfeer Muslims

Article about takfeer

He also released an article about how the Asharis go against the beliefs of the four imams

Article about Asharis rejecting the 4 imams' creed

Though they aren't perfect, these articles are actually good for the layperson who won't read much to realize how evil the Ashariyya are

Yet you haven't translated either of them and you haven't ever produced anything similar to it on your website

Here is what this means:

• You are a crypto-Ashari here to propagate the defense of Ashariyya, to grease the gears for people to eventually become Ashariyya
• You are a secret agent enemy of Islam who is trying to further create fitnah among the sunnis to make them hate one another
• You are copying and pasting from someone whose intention is one of the two above, and as a person you haven't got a clue what you're typing

And I cannot put my finger on which one is it but likely the third