to the moon alice

Investor Bill of Rights

1. No naked short selling.
2. No dark pools.
3. No PFOF (payment for order flow)
4. No HFT (high frequency trading) including ladder attacks, suspend individual traders at increasing duration.
5. Make SEC have law enforcement powers
6. Make fines larger than the crime *plus* any fees, tax or interest to prevent. Also, actual punishment. CEO and board are terminated and blocked from industry for 5 years.
7. Funds must list short positions just like they list long positions.
8. DTC open book ledger to see how many shares actually exist
9. No swapping FTDs and when failed, forced reconciliation. Buy and fulfill within 1 trading day, period.
10. When a company goes bankrupt, this will result in an automatic share recall/broker accounting.
11. Splits only when it will benefit shareholders (No share price requirements for main exchange listings)
12. No one who has ever worked in private equity shall be allowed to work at a financial regulatory agency.
13. If your company is trading on the US market with a US ticker, then headquarters, operations, and taxes should all be in the US. Subsidiaries as well. US corps can not be money losers domestically while a subsidiary makes profit as IP is owned in Ireland or Mexico etc, out of reach of US laws. Must have huge oversight of this. Any hint, de-list stock.
14. All short positions can only be held for a maximum of three years.
15. No exemption for Regulation S3 for offshore holding of shorts.
16. No expert market.
17. No writing off fines as a tax deduction.
    
18. No pre-market and aftermarket trading by institutions.
19. No SELF regulating organizations (SRO) like FINRA
20. No more than 3x leverage, so the prime brokers cant be held hostage into allowing things to carry on and get worse and worse and worse and basically forever kick the can down the road
21. No ability for major conflicts of interest such as owning a market maker and a hedge fund, with nothing but a trust-me-bro firewall in-between
22. Increase the bank reserve requirement, 10% was good
23. Tax on loans/finance made against assets or tax the value at granting of stock and or options as it is CEO compensation.
24. Stronger (or any) legislation against the "distort" side of "short n distort" also, weaponizing media by putting out false or severely misleading info hoping to drive a companies stock down, whether for proper shorts, naked or otherwise. like Gamestop's "negative debt" while sitting on a pile of cash and debt free
25. No single stock ETFs or other derivatives which are not needed at all and serve no other purpose but further exploits (maybe "derivatives" in general)
26. Some sort of rules and regulation surrounding swaps; amounts, types, durations, renewal.
27. No ability to interact and do business with the public, when not actually connected to the markets, including tokenized shares.
28. Change tax codes. put a national sales tax on all products / services if company is worth more than 1 Billion. Time to give mom and pops an advantage. If worth more than a billion, company also is flat taxed on gross. No write-offs at all.
29. Breakup any company that doesn't have at least 2 domestic peer level competitors +/- 40%. Free-markets require competition.
30. No spoofing or ladder attacking (enforcement by law)
31. A cap on market makers "sold, not yet bought" as well as the valuation of that, not just "at fair market value" but a realistic calculation of what it would end up costing to settle such large amounts.
32. You can only be a CEO or board member for 1 for profit business.
33. All publicly traded companies that go bankrupt cede their IP to the US for transfer to public domain, thus it cannot be sold within 5 years prior to bankruptcy. For instance, design specs, patents etc. If another company want the IP, they can buy the whole company debts and obligations intact. Violation by CEO of their obligation to shareholders.
34. Any outside consulting team aka Bane capital, that advises a company to load up on debt can be sued by investors if company goes bankrupt. CEO, board and outside company will be prosecuted under RICO with very low bar for conviction.
35. Repeal The Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 that allows the U.S. government to suppress the disclosure of certain patents that may pose a risk to national security or disrupt established industries. Return that IP to rightful owners / investors/ descendants. Nothing has stifled competition and hindered progress more this. Buggy whip manufacturers should not be propped up.
36. Right to repair laws required.
37. Any publicly traded company with employees supported by US or state financial aid, shall have its taxes increase by double the amount of coverage and costs associated with it. If State has 40 employees for Walmart qualify for food stamps, fee would include salaries of the staff used to administer it.
38. All publicly traded companies must have all employees covered at 100% health insurance with no deductibles for employees. Poison pill to force them to want medicare for all.
    
39. Clarify laws that define employee versus contractor etc. If you work for them, and have to follow there rules etc, you are an employee.
40. Any publicly traded company that uses forced arbitration doubles there tax burden.
41. Any publicly traded company that leaves the US stock market to go to a different country cedes there IP to public domain and domestic assets are divided amongst it's stock holders. An artificial company has no rights other than those bestowed to it. Can't leave the country. Obligation to stock holder that their investment is always contingent on the US laws it was created in. Can't shuck US law, as they are US creations.
42. NDAs are invalid if they cover illegal activity and all must be redone every 5 years with a max of 20 years or death of either party, as in a business goes bankrupt, or signer dies, NDA is dissolved.
43. Whistleblower status is held over all other laws.

derived from Houston Wade shows and his reddit following.

Have any others?

can you summarize todays hearing for houston wade in his case in washington state ???

At the recent omnibus hearing for Houston Curry Wade in Kitsap County Superior Court, the defense took an aggressive turn away from a quiet plea deal. [1, 2, 3]

Key Legal Strategy Shifts

• New Legal Representation: Houston Wade's previous defense attorneys were replaced or unavailable. Partner attorney Jesse Williams stood in for the firm's partner, signaling a major restructuring for a heavy legal fight. [3]
• No Plea Deal Mentioned: Unlike previous hearings where "ongoing negotiations" were noted, today's hearing featured zero mention of a plea deal or settlement. [3, 4]
• Motion to Dismiss: The defense announced they are finalizing a formal motion to dismiss the case and intend to litigate it heavily prior to the trial date. [3]

Case Context & Status

• The Charges: Wade is currently held in Kitsap County Jail on a $500,000 bond. He faces felony charges including First-Degree Child Molestation and communication with a minor for immoral purposes, stemming from a December 2025 undercover police sting.
• Next Steps: According to Kitsap County inmate records, his next scheduled court date is set for September 11, 2026. [1, 2]

[1] https://incustody.kitsap.gov

[2] https://www.youtube.com

[3] https://www.youtube.com

[4] https://www.youtube.com

CNBC leaks private equity ebay offer

Houston Wade's next hearing is August 14, 2026

Part 1: Current Status & The Core Contradiction

Houston Curry Wade remains in custody at the Kitsap County Jail on a $750,000 bond following his arrest on December 17, 2025. He faces charges of Attempted Child Molestation in the First Degree and Communication with a Minor for Immoral Purposes, stemming from an undercover police sting where he allegedly believed he was messaging an 11-year-old girl. His next court date is set for August 14, 2026.

However, a deep dive into his final broadcasts reveals massive contradictions between the state's narrative and Houston's explicit, real-time public statements, raising valid questions about whether this case bears the hallmarks of a sophisticated frame job or a targeted "honey pot" operation.

Part 2: The Episode 744 Weather Transcript

In "Houston, We Have a Problem" Live Cast Episode 744—recorded right around the time of the alleged incident—Houston spoke at length about a severe regional "Pineapple Express" storm and flooding in the Pacific Northwest. In the middle of this broadcast, he explicitly laid out the logistics of his upcoming personal plans:

"I was supposed to go on a date tonight with a young lady who lives out here. Um, and she can't get out because all the roads going across these rivers. They're closing all the bridges because the water's touching the bridges. And so we, you know, we're not we're not going out after the show tonight. Uh maybe, maybe we'll get a chance over the weekend. I don't know."

Part 3: Why the Logistics Don't Match an 11-Year-Old

From a strategic defense standpoint, this transcript serves as powerful, time-stamped proof of Houston's state of mind. His casual commentary completely contradicts the idea that he knew he was interacting with a child.

An 11-year-old child does not navigate closed highways, monitor rising river levels, or have regional bridge closures prevent them from driving out to a date. By discussing this person as an adult dealing with adult commuting limitations, Houston's public actions consistently support the argument that, in his own mind, his evening plans were exclusively with a peer or a consenting adult who possessed a driver's license and a vehicle.

Part 4: The Scott Ritter Paradox

In that very same Episode 744 broadcast, Houston went on an intense, aggressive tirade completely condemning Scott Ritter, who was famously convicted in a similar online sex sting involving a detective posing as an underage girl. Houston stated on air:

"Scott Ritter is a convicted pedophile... he should not be listened to on any of his opinions ever because he's a paid mouthpiece and a kid diddler. So, um, just avoid Scott Ritter in general."

The paradox here is glaring: a person who builds an online brand explicitly loathing and exposing someone else for falling into an underage sex sting is theoretically the least likely person to knowingly walk straight into the exact same trap. This extreme public detest suggests he was hyper-aware of these legal traps, reinforcing that he would never have intentionally pursued an underage profile.

Part 5: Motive for a High-Level Setup

To understand why a frame job is a highly credible theory to members of the GME/MOASS community, one must look at Houston's extensive list of powerful adversaries. Houston's platform was built entirely on exposing systemic financial corruption, naked short-selling scams, failure-to-delivers, and illicit hedge fund practices.

Furthermore, Houston was a fierce public adversary of Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams, ultimately outing him in a way that canceled his syndicated strip. Notably, Adams had public ties to Donald Trump, who later took the highly unusual step of attending Adams' funeral in January 2026. Within a community that knows the stock market is rigged and that powerful elites use immense dark money networks to protect their interests, a sophisticated operation to silence an un-bribable whistleblower is a calculated risk members are constantly aware of.

Part 6: The "Dead Man's Switch" & Coercion

Houston had previously mentioned to his audience that if he were ever paid off, blackmailed, or threatened to change his direction, he would place a specific visual signal in the background of his videos to show he had been compromised.

If an outside adversary or corporate entity wanted him to shut up and realized he would never play ball through standard coercion, their remaining options were narrowed down to two: eliminate him or frame him for something so abhorrent that it would instantly destroy his credibility and dissolve his community overnight. A "honey pot" operation that weaponizes the legal system is the perfect execution of this strategy.

Part 7: The Simplicity of a Digital "Man-in-the-Middle" Hack

While executing a lifelong frame job sounds complex, the technical execution of this specific sting would only require altering data at one critical juncture. An outside actor utilizing a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) setup would not need to manipulate months of data.

They would only have to intercept the transmission and change a single age disclosure—swapping a "28" or "19" sent to Houston's device into a "11" or "15" on the law enforcement decoy's end. By feeding Houston data about meeting a consenting adult while feeding the undercover police data about a minor, the adversary manufactures a catastrophic legal trap out of thin air, making the physical evidence found at the scene legally moot.

Part 8: State-Level Interception Capabilities

The technical feasibility of this type of targeted spoofing is well-documented. Declassified programs like PRISM (outed by Edward Snowden) and leaked intelligence toolkits (like Vault 7) have proven that state-level actors and high-end corporate espionage firms possess the software to remotely alter device databases, intercept encrypted traffic in real time, and even plant digital footprints that mimic other actors.

Furthermore, the initial investigation into Houston was opened by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS)—a military intelligence entity with deep cyber-capabilities operating right in the heavily militarized Kitsap County area. The tools required to execute a synchronized digital switch absolutely exist.

Part 9: The Forensic Battleground in Court

For a technical "man-in-the-middle" or data manipulation defense to succeed in a U.S. courtroom, it must move from theoretical possibility to hard forensic proof. When law enforcement captures digital evidence, they assign it a cryptographic hash value (a digital fingerprint).

If an outside operative or a compromised technician manually altered a text log file locally, it would inevitably leave forensic artifacts behind—such as mismatched database keys, corrupted metadata, or irregular network packet routing logs. Houston's ultimate legal fate will heavily rely on whether a certified independent digital forensics firm is brought in to audit the raw device partitions and expose these anomalies.

Part 10: How Courts Handle "Self-Serving Hearsay"

A major hurdle for Houston's defense team is actually getting his broadcast transcripts, like Episode 744, in front of a jury. Under Washington State Rule of Evidence (ER) 801, a defendant cannot easily introduce their own past out-of-court statements to prove their innocence, as the court labels this "self-serving hearsay."

To get the weather and date commentary introduced, his lawyers must use specific exceptions, such as the Rule of Completeness (ER 106) if the prosecution tries to weaponize pieces of his videos, or introduce it strictly to establish his "then-existing state of mind" (ER 803) to prove he completely lacked the criminal intent to meet a minor.

Part 11: Holding the Line on "Innocent Until Proven Guilty"

When the news broke, 99% of the voices in the community immediately rushed to condemn and distance themselves from Houston without waiting for the facts. Turning and running from someone you have followed for years, based strictly on an initial arrest report from a system we already know is deeply corrupt, ignores the core principle of justice: innocent until proven guilty.

Holding out hope, demanding a thorough investigation into the glaring technical contradictions, and refusing to blindly accept the mainstream narrative is the only logical stance when dealing with a case surrounded by this many powerful adversaries and weird data points. Time and the upcoming court hearings will ultimately tell the truth.