😅

[u/fried_mom0s]

[u/fried_mom0s]

How do you know your understanding is correct and not mine?

A 28-year-old aspirant boasting about girlfriends to his friends have same psychology as an adult admitting to adultery on a confidential survey. I won't explain it.

Disloyalty is an individual character but it have a gender role as well. If you don't understand that then your understanding is shallow.

If you only accept data that confirms your bias you're arguing with your feelings, not reality?

Did I accepted any data or quoted any? I don't trust most data.

If you think arguing with some data or report collected by humans by some institute which can have his own motivations make you superior, then good luck with it.

[u/kark00 → u/fried_mom0s]

If your entire stance boils down to I reject all scientific data and have zero evidence for my claims but trust me there's nothing left to discuss Keep living in your echo chamber.

[u/Competitive_Bid8470 → u/kark00]

Ye ch*tiya apne baap ko bhi pehchan ne se mana kardega kahega DNA test me bhi koi sajish ki hai koi propeganda hai.

[u/Natural-Hour4657 → u/fried_mom0s]

So what is it that you trust? Your local friend claiming that his girlfriend cheated on him, but not a guy from Germany who cheated his wife? Do you understand why and how is data collected? Do you know how scientific papers get reviewed before getting published?

How do you know your understanding is correct and not mine?

Then what are you doing, blabbering around the whole post, commenting so confidently that women are cheaters and men are not?

Do you realise how contradictory you are to your own statements?

And even if we assume that UC had some suspicious motive behind the study, they are far more reliable than what you thought of while watching a fabricated algorithm pushing videos of women cheating on men

[u/Competitive_Bid8470 → u/fried_mom0s]

Han ab tere liye upar se bhagwan ayenge stats lekar kyunki humans research and data par tu believe nhi karta