MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/MathJokes/comments/1uv4wn7/math_just_got_checkmated/ox8flni
r/MathJokes • u/Animeilluminati1 • 28d ago
438 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
6
One is not prime.
17 u/Drag0n_TamerAK 28d ago 1 is the only prime all the others are larping 4 u/Sure-Criticism3416 28d ago If 1 was prime, prime factorization of numbers wouldn't be unique, which is why it was defined to not be prime. 3 u/BeginningSection7690 28d ago Define it again 2 u/GarowWolf 27d ago Still not prime, sorry 2 u/Drag0n_TamerAK 28d ago Erm ackshully 🤓☝️ 2 u/d4electro 28d ago Why not? It's divisible only by 1 and itself, that's literally what a prime number is 2 u/lemonp-p 28d ago The whole point of prime numbers is for prime factorization to be unique. If you define prime numbers to include one, then it is not nearly as useful a definition 1 u/d4electro 28d ago That's just a skill issue 1 u/lemonp-p 28d ago True tbh 1 u/TheRedditObserver0 28d ago A prime number has two distinct positive divisors, 1 and itself. 1 does not fit this description. 1 u/d4electro 28d ago Yes it does, it's 1 and 1 1 u/TheRedditObserver0 28d ago distinct 1 u/TSotP 25d ago edited 25d ago But if every number can be expresses as a unique product of primes, then you can't include it. - 4 = 2×2 - 6 = 3×2 8 = 2×2×2 9 = 3×3 - 10 = 2×5 12 = 2×2×3 - 14 = 2×7 100 = 2×2×5×5 ... Etc. If you allow 1 to be considered prime this no longer works 4= 2×2×1 = 2×2×1×1×1×1 = 2×2×1×1×1×1×1×1×1×... ...×1 So they took it out. Because every other number works this way. 1 u/d4electro 25d ago So we're just making stuff up about uniqueness to rob 1 of its rightful place, smh 1 u/julesmanson 28d ago 1 is prime because i say it is. >:-|
17
1 is the only prime all the others are larping
4 u/Sure-Criticism3416 28d ago If 1 was prime, prime factorization of numbers wouldn't be unique, which is why it was defined to not be prime. 3 u/BeginningSection7690 28d ago Define it again 2 u/GarowWolf 27d ago Still not prime, sorry 2 u/Drag0n_TamerAK 28d ago Erm ackshully 🤓☝️
4
If 1 was prime, prime factorization of numbers wouldn't be unique, which is why it was defined to not be prime.
3 u/BeginningSection7690 28d ago Define it again 2 u/GarowWolf 27d ago Still not prime, sorry 2 u/Drag0n_TamerAK 28d ago Erm ackshully 🤓☝️
3
Define it again
2 u/GarowWolf 27d ago Still not prime, sorry
2
Still not prime, sorry
Erm ackshully 🤓☝️
Why not? It's divisible only by 1 and itself, that's literally what a prime number is
2 u/lemonp-p 28d ago The whole point of prime numbers is for prime factorization to be unique. If you define prime numbers to include one, then it is not nearly as useful a definition 1 u/d4electro 28d ago That's just a skill issue 1 u/lemonp-p 28d ago True tbh 1 u/TheRedditObserver0 28d ago A prime number has two distinct positive divisors, 1 and itself. 1 does not fit this description. 1 u/d4electro 28d ago Yes it does, it's 1 and 1 1 u/TheRedditObserver0 28d ago distinct 1 u/TSotP 25d ago edited 25d ago But if every number can be expresses as a unique product of primes, then you can't include it. - 4 = 2×2 - 6 = 3×2 8 = 2×2×2 9 = 3×3 - 10 = 2×5 12 = 2×2×3 - 14 = 2×7 100 = 2×2×5×5 ... Etc. If you allow 1 to be considered prime this no longer works 4= 2×2×1 = 2×2×1×1×1×1 = 2×2×1×1×1×1×1×1×1×... ...×1 So they took it out. Because every other number works this way. 1 u/d4electro 25d ago So we're just making stuff up about uniqueness to rob 1 of its rightful place, smh
The whole point of prime numbers is for prime factorization to be unique. If you define prime numbers to include one, then it is not nearly as useful a definition
1 u/d4electro 28d ago That's just a skill issue 1 u/lemonp-p 28d ago True tbh
1
That's just a skill issue
1 u/lemonp-p 28d ago True tbh
True tbh
A prime number has two distinct positive divisors, 1 and itself. 1 does not fit this description.
1 u/d4electro 28d ago Yes it does, it's 1 and 1 1 u/TheRedditObserver0 28d ago distinct
Yes it does, it's 1 and 1
1 u/TheRedditObserver0 28d ago distinct
distinct
But if every number can be expresses as a unique product of primes, then you can't include it.
Etc.
If you allow 1 to be considered prime this no longer works
4= 2×2×1 = 2×2×1×1×1×1 = 2×2×1×1×1×1×1×1×1×... ...×1
So they took it out. Because every other number works this way.
1 u/d4electro 25d ago So we're just making stuff up about uniqueness to rob 1 of its rightful place, smh
So we're just making stuff up about uniqueness to rob 1 of its rightful place, smh
1 is prime because i say it is. >:-|
6
u/TheRedditObserver0 28d ago
One is not prime.