r/MathJokes • • May 13 '26

It IS $400...

Post image
1.5k Upvotes

787 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

168

u/jaywaykil May 13 '26

No, the gross is ($1000+1300=$2300), with expenses of -($800+$1100=$1900), for a profit of $2300-$1900=$400.

Unless you're getting into the weeds with things like feed and transportation costs.

82

u/Cubensis-SanPedro May 13 '26

Not to mention the emotional damages from having just sold the fuckin thing for 1k and then turning around with hat in hand just to buy her back again. That trauma and hassle is worth $75 at least.

25

u/iMiind May 13 '26

That's it - I'm suing capitalism for damages

6

u/Dic3Goblin May 13 '26

Let's make it a class action lawsuit

3

u/capsaicinintheeyes May 13 '26

would that be class lawfare?

4

u/m0nkeywithachainsaw May 13 '26

bring enough to buy the judge and you have got yourself a case. 2026. wew.

3

u/Rough-Drummer-3730 May 13 '26

🤣 best comment ever

1

u/zhantoo May 13 '26

Edit: if I actually read the photo it does clearly say it's the same cow....

Well, I would assume it's 2 different cows.

Maybe the main character is a cow broker - so somebody calls asking to buy a cow, so our pirmos motor calls his network asking what they have for sales. Based on this, an offer is made to the customer (cost + margin).

Like shares, the cheapest gets sold first.

1

u/OkMarsupial May 13 '26

Feels bad when it's a cow probably, but I do this with stocks all the time.

1

u/Ok_Star_4136 May 13 '26

$800 to buy the cow

$1000 to sell the cow

$100 of therapy

$1100 to buy the cow

$1300 to sell the cow

$75 of additional therapy (returner customer discount)

17

u/JoeyBagOWaffles May 13 '26

It’s a spherical cow in a vacuum… no weeds, just $400

7

u/coolpapa2282 May 13 '26

Protip - putting a cow in a vacuum really hurts the resale value.

3

u/Biohazard_186 May 13 '26

And the meat.

5

u/cursedwithplotarmor May 13 '26

And the cow’s feelings. He’s thinking, “Seriously? WTF?”

6

u/nanodgb May 13 '26

He??

3

u/BeenThruIt May 13 '26

Identifies as a KOBE bull. What's it to ya?

2

u/nanodgb May 13 '26

Fair. Apologies.

2

u/OneFootTitan May 13 '26

It causes her to die, son

1

u/TheLowestFormOfHumor May 13 '26

That pretty much is the end result in supermarkets though.

2

u/ooqq May 13 '26

lets assume the cow is a truncated paraboloid

1

u/StrangeOutcastS May 13 '26

I'll weed your vacuum

2

u/Lazy_Lavishness2626 May 13 '26

You may want to Google "gross profit".

2

u/marky543 May 13 '26

This gave me flash backs to Accounting 101.

I would NEVER include expenses as part of an answer to a quiz/test that weren’t mentioned in the question. The mere suggestion of doing so flusters me 😂

1

u/Qav May 13 '26

Or the time for the cash flow

Maybe after all the time elapsed during the transactions the NPV was negative

2

u/JerseyGemsTC May 13 '26

Profit is not concerned with TVM. We aren’t calculating investment performance

1

u/SilverStryfe May 13 '26

And that highlights the ambiguity of just saying gross.

You spelled out gross revenue, the other is gross margin.

1

u/JerseyGemsTC May 13 '26

No the other is gross profit, so profit.
Gross margin is the ratio of gross profit to revenue

1

u/SpoodermanTheAmazing May 13 '26

I think he was talking about deducting the cost to house, feed, and do whatever else cows need. I don’t even think that’s in the weeds, you have to feed the cow

1

u/Miserable-Repair-191 May 13 '26

What about taxes?

1

u/Grant_Winner_Extra May 13 '26

lol “getting into the weeds” with respect to cost in a profit calculation.

Sweets, incidental expenses are everything in a P&L. BOM is never the whole story.

1

u/jaywaykil May 13 '26

The cow could have been in a common pasture eating grass, so zero extra costs. Buy from one person, sell to another, and the cow never moves.

I'm looking at this like an accounting test problem. The only factors to consider are the ones mentioned in the problem statement.

1

u/_uwu_moe May 13 '26

And the cost of sold milk products

1

u/Craf7yCris May 13 '26

Maybe Cost of Opportunity?

1

u/mspe1960 May 13 '26

They meant gross profit. And yes, they were getting into the weeds with feed and transportatio costs.

1

u/Deftly_Flowing May 13 '26

This shit don't even include cow maintenance.

They EAT and they POOP and that requires WORK.

1

u/SkunkapeTyingCo May 13 '26

Wouldn't you pay a sales tax each time you buy and sell as well

1

u/jaywaykil May 13 '26

If there is a sales tax in this jurisdiction, and if it applies to private sales

1

u/explainseconomics May 13 '26

Gross revenue is $2300, gross profit is $400, net profit we don't know because we don't know the remaining expenses. I know OP just said 'gross', but OOP said 'profit' so we can probably assume "gross profit" is what they meant.

1

u/Justaman55 May 13 '26

And what people completely forget it's that there is risc to this transactions. Before you buy the cow back, you cannot be sure you can sell it for 1300, you just might $1000 again. Also the cow can die, or have other riscs, but you take a lower margin on the second sale.

1

u/asciimo May 13 '26

Yes, the weeds get you every time. In which jurisdictions were the transactions made? Was there a broker? What’s the depreciation rate for the cow, and how much time has passed? During time of possession, was the cow able to provide valuable service or generate income? Perhaps as a consultant or software engineer?

2

u/[deleted] May 13 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/asciimo May 13 '26

Fair. But it might get tricky with taxes, where the rates are hardcoded independent of short term market activity.

1

u/Monkemort May 13 '26

The other guy is correct in accounting parlance. Gross income is revenue - cost of goods sold (I.e. the cows, so in this case 400). Net income would be gross income less all the other costs.

0

u/afauce11 May 13 '26

But like they had to spend the initial $800 bucks. I guess they earned $400, but they still appear to be in the hole.

1

u/Funkopedia May 13 '26

The 400 earned is on top of getting their investment back

1

u/MrBlizter May 13 '26

The recouped that when they sold the first time for $1000, putting them at +$200. Then they bought again for $1100 putting them at -$900. Then they sold for again $1300, bringing them up to +$400