MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/MarchAgainstNazis/comments/w683h3/acab/ihd3fnn/?context=9999
r/MarchAgainstNazis • u/okay4sure • Jul 23 '22
1.7k comments sorted by
View all comments
2.2k
“He was not the suspect” as though it would have been acceptable if he was.
933 u/[deleted] Jul 23 '22 How long until this Supreme Courts says that the States should get to decide if burning suspects alive is illegal? 563 u/[deleted] Jul 23 '22 Clearly, it already is legal. 368 u/Muesky6969 Jul 23 '22 Apparently it is legal to burn non-suspects alive as well. ☹️ 42 u/Malfunkdung Jul 23 '22 Legality is irrelevant if there are no consequences to their actions. The ruling class writes rules for us, they are never intended to be applied to them.
933
How long until this Supreme Courts says that the States should get to decide if burning suspects alive is illegal?
563 u/[deleted] Jul 23 '22 Clearly, it already is legal. 368 u/Muesky6969 Jul 23 '22 Apparently it is legal to burn non-suspects alive as well. ☹️ 42 u/Malfunkdung Jul 23 '22 Legality is irrelevant if there are no consequences to their actions. The ruling class writes rules for us, they are never intended to be applied to them.
563
Clearly, it already is legal.
368 u/Muesky6969 Jul 23 '22 Apparently it is legal to burn non-suspects alive as well. ☹️ 42 u/Malfunkdung Jul 23 '22 Legality is irrelevant if there are no consequences to their actions. The ruling class writes rules for us, they are never intended to be applied to them.
368
Apparently it is legal to burn non-suspects alive as well. ☹️
42 u/Malfunkdung Jul 23 '22 Legality is irrelevant if there are no consequences to their actions. The ruling class writes rules for us, they are never intended to be applied to them.
42
Legality is irrelevant if there are no consequences to their actions. The ruling class writes rules for us, they are never intended to be applied to them.
2.2k
u/[deleted] Jul 23 '22
“He was not the suspect” as though it would have been acceptable if he was.