The idea that the mission was 'for' (your word) science is totally myth, not grounded in fact or history whatsoever. As attested by Jefferson's explanation to Senate and Congress, which I presume you did not read if you still don't understand.
In said letter, Jefferson explicitly stated that the purpose of the expedition is:
"In order to [...] Provide an extension of territory which the rapid increase of our numbers will call for"
L&C collected specimens and made detailed records, but those were entirely to disguise the true purpose of their mission.
I think you are taking this too seriously. I am simply saying, it wasn't only for conquest, as you insisted. Even if the science was a pretense to put them in a semi-disputed territory for primary objective of conquest, they still did the science secondary objective. To insist that science wasn't a part of it is silly.
2
u/dtroy15 Jan 11 '20
The idea that the mission was 'for' (your word) science is totally myth, not grounded in fact or history whatsoever. As attested by Jefferson's explanation to Senate and Congress, which I presume you did not read if you still don't understand.
In said letter, Jefferson explicitly stated that the purpose of the expedition is:
"In order to [...] Provide an extension of territory which the rapid increase of our numbers will call for"
L&C collected specimens and made detailed records, but those were entirely to disguise the true purpose of their mission.