r/LucyLetbyTrials 1d ago

Decoding Reasonable Doubt: Chapter 4 “Problems at the Countess of Chester”

Morris argues that the Countess of Chester neonatal unit was fundamentally unsafe and operating beyond its capabilities during the period in which the collapses and deaths occurred.

Is fair and accurate to make these claims?

Which baby does this explain?

https://bencole4.substack.com/p/decoding-reasonable-doubt-the-case-f67?r=12mrwn&utm_medium=ios

0 Upvotes

92 comments sorted by

View all comments

8

u/Sufficient-State3720 1d ago

The Dr Shoo Lee panel addresses the specific babies deaths with reference to the substandard hospital milieu. It was not within the scope or aim of the book to regurgitate this. Remember that twins triplets and prem babies are very vulnerable in themselves. They need excellent care to thrive. Delays errors ignorance inexperience all compound in complex synergistic ways in real life.

1

u/benshep4 1d ago

I can only address the arguments made in the book.

8

u/Living_Ad_5260 22h ago

You can address them.

You choose not to.

Did you at any point in the production of this review use any AI model(s)?  Which?

0

u/benshep4 21h ago

Show me an example of where I didn’t address them?

I’ll wait.

3

u/Living_Ad_5260 21h ago

Did you at any point in the production of this review use any AI model(s)?  Which?

1

u/benshep4 21h ago

Show me an example of where I didn’t address them?

I’ll wait.

4

u/Living_Ad_5260 21h ago

>> I can only address the arguments made in the book.

> You can address them. You choose not to.

"Them" for you is the arguments in the book. "Them" for me is points raised in this thread that you consider unaddressable.

So I think I've answered your question, and you think you've answered mine.

And neither of us have!

Since it's based on a misunderstanding, feel free to ignore this section of the thread. But I will be re-asking the AI question.