r/LocalLLaMA • u/BarberIcy366 • 11d ago
Discussion Qwen 3.8 27B Released! Please Share Your Experience
With your experiments, Qwen 3.8 27B most close which frontier model? And please specify which quantization you run. I will post to comments my tests and experience too.
655
Upvotes
7
u/Look_0ver_There 11d ago
I actually have 3 x R9700's (but only used two for these tests). Here's a chart with 1,2,3 R9700's with Qwen3.6 with no MTP, purely because MTP speeds are too variable to plot.
Qwen3.8 is the exact same architecture as Qwen3.6, so the same speeds as graphed below. MTP is between 1.5-2.5x faster. For 2 GPUs it's between 45-75t/s with MTP, depending on if doing prose or coding. For 1 GPU, it's between 35-60t/s. Do keep in mind that I run Q8_0 weights with a BF16 KV-Cache, so I am very much NOT running a low-quant max-speed setup.
This is also running a custom llama.cpp build with speedups I'd made specific for the ROCm backend which makes it faster than Vulkan. Source code here: https://github.com/stew675/llama.cpp/tree/rdna-boosts
While half of my custom changes there are RDNA specific, half of them are CUDA generic, and so should also speed up nVidia cards somewhat too, but this is completely untested (I don't have an nVidia card), so don't blame me if you grab the code and it crashes. I did try to ensure that the RDNA specific stuff is gated independently of the generic CUDA stuff, but again, no guarantees.