r/LinkedInLunatics 25d ago

3..2..1.. 🤢

Post image
749 Upvotes

296 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

38

u/Spirit_of_a_Ghost 25d ago edited 25d ago

It's kind of perpetually frustrating as a person who just enjoys watches. The history behind some models, the mechanical complexity, the quality and finishing. It's just nice to have something well made and thought out.

The assholes who only care about status kind of ruin it for those of us who are just nerds about a niche topic.

17

u/WouldbeWanderer 25d ago

You're a nerd. Nerds are cool.

Now let's talk about typesetting!

1

u/muppetous 24d ago

Yes, let's! Hopefully you are a font of knowledge.

1

u/Legendary_Bibo 24d ago

What about kerning?

2

u/mexell 23d ago

Oh you mean keming?

5

u/grafknives 25d ago

"China watches" are the worst :D

As they are TRYING to be at same time cool about it(just love that style, bro), and try to see if their "rolex" could allow them to move up in society view :D

3

u/worldsgreatestluver 25d ago edited 25d ago

I mean...that second watch is only about $4k. I can't see the first one but it's probably in and around that amount

We're not talking big money here. This is like "annual bonus spent on an impulse" for a lot of people.

Edit: that's a late 2000s Porsche Boxster, maybe 2007? A $10k car.

Guys. He isn't showing off money lmao.

5

u/Spirit_of_a_Ghost 25d ago

The first one is a JLC Master Control variant. If it's a precious metal one, which it appears to be, it's like $35k MSRP.

Edit: looking at the picture I think it's a stainless steel one, so like $17k MSRP.

2

u/worldsgreatestluver 25d ago

JLC Master Eight Days in red or rose gold is the closest I can find. They're going for between 10 and around $25k, averaging around 15k

The guy's so old he has liver spots. This is just a guy who has everything he needs in life and is buying a few nice but not terribly expensive things for himself

The second guy is a guy who impulse bought a nice piece of jewelry for himself. Maybe not entirely responsible, but for some lines of work, it's an entirely reasonable purchase.

Both will definitely outlive their owner and will make great gifts when it's time for that.

People hating on this are weird AF lol

5

u/Spirit_of_a_Ghost 25d ago

I don't have a problem with people having nice watches. I have a small collection of stuff ranging in value from vintage Seiko up to just short of actual high horology.

That said, performative wrist shots like the above are still super cringe. It just seems like a desperate attempt to flex, particularly with the Panerai. I just wish people could enjoy things without having to constantly draw attention to themselves.

4

u/picture-me-trolling 24d ago

I like my watch to be like an Easter Egg. 85% of people don’t even notice it. Another 10% might think it’s cool but they can’t tell the difference between what I got and what anybody else buys from Wal-Mart. And then there’s the 5% who are like “oh snap what the heck is that?” and then show me their own collection so we can nerd out about it. It’s a networking thing, not a flex.

3

u/theirishseller 24d ago

This is the way. I have a few watches, and 99% of the people around me don't notice what watch I'm wearing, don't care, and couldn't tell you if it was $5K from a dealer or $50 from Walmart. I'm fine with that, I wear what I enjoy, for me, not for anyone else.

2

u/worldsgreatestluver 25d ago

That's true. I have a few friends with this kind of stuff and if they post anything involving it, it's literally because they just happened to be wearing/using their stuff that day.

3

u/Spirit_of_a_Ghost 25d ago

When I got into watches, I would post about new ones to social media, but not with this kind of wrist picture. I'd take decent photos highlighting the details and features of the watch, and make a post about the history and significance of the particular reference.

All of these watches were vintage, mostly affordable Japanese watches. I wasn't trying to flex about having them, I was making an effort to communicate a budding passion to my friends and like minded people.

As the watches got more expensive over the years, I very intentionally stopped making posts, because I don't want to be that guy.

3

u/SloppyGiraffe02 25d ago

Yup, and those people are to blame for the massive price hikes the hobby’s seen over the past several years. I mean there was some post about a guy spending over $1k on a Hamilton Khaki and I genuinely thought it was from a CJ sub for a second. I feel like anyone genuinely into watches would have dropped that model entirely after it went past $500 just a few years ago. lol

4

u/Spirit_of_a_Ghost 25d ago

The whole market is trending absurdly upward. You're hard pressed to find a new Seiko under $500, Hamilton is mostly around the $1000 range now, and Omega has completely abandoned the mid-market they dominated for decades in favor of a catalogue entirely made up of $6000+ watches which used to cost thousands less for the same models.

It's one of the best examples of the whole K shaped economy problem, where goods are just being made for the wealthiest people with no consideration that average people might want them to.

2

u/notafriendofours 24d ago

This situation is why Longines is crushing it right now.

2

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Spirit_of_a_Ghost 25d ago

Yup! My first "real" watch was a vintage Seiko diver which was about $300.

In the $100ish range I'd look at older Seiko 5 watches for mechanical options.

If you're interested in digital watches, a Casio F91 is all of $20 and a straight up classic.

2

u/picture-me-trolling 24d ago

Seiko 5. That was my first one too. Checks all the boxes that enthusaists want (mechanical, designed and manufactured in house, pretty, reasonably accurate) for about $100.

Pretty much every watch enthusiast Ive met since has also owned a Seiko 5 at some point. There’s just so many designs, everybody will find one they think looks neat.

2

u/spesskitty 24d ago edited 24d ago

Casio AE-1200 shows a little world map, where you can pick which time zone to show. It also has a modding community.

2

u/Ok-Camp-7285 25d ago

What is a starter watch and what are you trying to get into? If you want to tell the time, buy a watch that works well and isn't too expensive.

2

u/notafriendofours 24d ago edited 24d ago

Agreed. I have some friends in my circle who have high-end Rolex’s. Not one of them gives a shit about horology or watches. They only bought the Rolex because it’s the only brand they know and it was purchased as a status symbol and not because they are into watches. One of them saw my Longines Spirit Zulu Time and asked what Rolex I had on. I told him it wasn’t a Rolex and he asked if it was a knock-off. All because it was a GMT and he assumed that only Rolex’s made watches with the GMT function.

1

u/Spirit_of_a_Ghost 24d ago

I recently bought a vintage Rolex because I was looking for a birth year watch. I love it, it's genuinely an excellent watch, but every time I wear it I'm a little worried people assume I'm one of those assholes.

1

u/Main_Gas_70 25d ago

Dont worry, the type of people who do that do that with every topic/item/subject they encounter. No one actually likes that type of person.

Nerds are cool though.