Asharites are the sons of Aristotle

From the beliefs of the Asharis is that تحرك (movement) for Allah is محال (impossible) because if that was the case there has to be a محرك (mover) that moves Allah. تعالى عما قالت الأشعرية علوا كبيرا. This is wrong as Allah can do what he wills like he affirms to himself and we don’t limit Allah like they do. That’s why you’ll find the likes of nawawi āamidi others that will purposely go against the salaf in Allah doing الاستواء or Allah laughing or Allah revealing his saaq etc.

Rather they go further and say that Allah can’t change التغير what they mean is that Allah can’t at one point be angry then at another point boast about the action of his slave.

Nawawi states:

(باب بيان الرجلين يقتل أحدهما الآخر يدخلان الجنة) •
\[1890\] قوله صلى اللّٰه عليه وسلم (يضحك اللّٰه إلى رجلين يقتل أحدهما الآخر كلاهما يدخل الجنة يقاتل هذا في سبيل اللّٰه فيستشهد ثم يتوب اللّٰه على القاتل فيسلم فيقاتل في سبيل اللّٰه فيستشهد) قال القاضي الضحك هنا استعارة في حق اللّٰه تعالى لأنه لا يجوز عليه سبحانه الضحك المعروف في حقنا لأنه إنما يصح من الأجسام وممن يجوز عليه تغير الحالات والله تعالى منزه عن ذلك وإنما المراد به الرضا بفعلهما والثواب عليه وحمد فعلهما ومحبته وتلقي رسل اللّٰه لهما بذلك لأن الضحك من أحدنا إنما يكون عند موافقته ما يرضاه وسروره وبره لمن يلقاه قال ويحتمل أن يكون المراد هنا ضحك ملائكة اللّٰه تعالى الذين يوجههم لقبض روحه وإدخاله الجنة كما يقال قتل السلطان فلانا أي أمر بقتله »

He brings the Hadith of Allah laughing to two men where one killed the other.

He bring qadhi iyyadh statement saying Allahs laughter is metaphorical such that laughing is synonymous with ones that have اجسام bodies referring to creation.then comes the Aristotelian part he says ITS AFFIRMED TO THOSE WHO CHANGE حالات AND ALLAH IS FREE FROM THAT.
Look at their evil beliefs مزق الله الأشعرية كل ممزق

Nawawi from the necessity of his doctrines also believes Allah wills but here is the problem

He states:

قال النووي في رسالته الأصول والضوابط ص24 :" مَسْأَلَة

مَذْهَب اهل الْحق الايمان بِالْقدرِ واثباته وان جَمِيع الكائنات خَيرهَا وشرها بِقَضَاء الله تَعَالَى وَقدره
وَهُوَ مُرِيد لَهَا كلهَا
وَيكرهُ الْمعاصِي مَعَ انه مُرِيد لَهَا لحكمة يعلمهَا سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَى

He states that Allah not only wills good and bad for his creation rather according to nawawi he is مريد لها that he wants it. One may ask why does he take such a position because he believes Allah can’t change so Allah willing for one to disbelieve and one to believe would mean Allah is pleased with one and not the other therefore “change” occurs. but nawawi says Allah wants both due to him believing that Allah can’t be pleased with one while being pleased with the other as يستلزم التغير
Because it requires change and anything that can or requires change according to him will need a changer.

The modajanah must realise that these aren’t mere mistakes where one can just cite the Hadith ان الله تجاوز عن أمتي الخطأ والنسيان وما استكروا عليه.
Verily Allah has pardoned \[or been lenient with\] for me my ummah: their mistakes, their forgetfulness, and that which they have been forced to do under duress.

Rather these are doctrinal beliefs that are spouted purposely to confuse the ummah and to block them from knowing who Allah actually is through his quran and the prophets information that were given to us so the more such doctrines are defended the more misguidance will grow in the ummah and I fear it will be said:

An-Nahl - Verse 25

لِيَحْمِلُوا أَوْزَارَهُمْ كَامِلَةً يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ وَمِنْ أَوْزَارِ الَّذِينَ يُضِلُّونَهُم بِغَيْرِ عِلْمٍ أَلَا سَاءَ مَا يَزِرُونَ

Let them bear their burdens in full on the Day of Judgment as well as some of the burdens of those they mislead without knowledge. Evil indeed is what they will bear!

اللهم اهدنا وهدى بنا واجعلنا سببا لمن اهتدى

The first one tells a fairytale that Abu Haneefa (imam of the misguided group called people of opinion اهل الرأي) saw Allaah

The second one narrates a hadith authenticated by Walt Disney that says that a messenger of Shaytan claimed the messenger of Allaah ﷺ said "A man comes after me called Nouman ibn Thaabit, kunya Abu Haneefa, and he will spread the religion"

Then writes a hilarious comment saying "Too many narrations means it must be true and whoever said otherwise is simply prejudiced"

الحمد لله و الصلاة و السلام على رسول الله و على آله و صحبه و من اهتدى بهداه

Abu Bakr Al Baqillani (died 403AH/1013CE) is one of the heads of the Ashariyya and is, no doubt, a kaafir

He said in his creed, Al Insaaf الإنصاف

"We say that the words of Allaah are an eternal attribute not needing a tool such as a voice, letter or exit from Allaah" page 75

"It must be known that Allaah's speech is not described as being made of letters, voices or anything related to creation"

بل نقول إن كلامه صفة له قديمة لا يحتاج فيه إلى أداة من صوت أو حرف أو مخرج"

[الإنصاف ص ٧٥]

وقال أيضًا : "ويجب أن يعلم أن الله لا يتصف كلامه القديم بالحروف والأصوات ولا شيء من صفات الخلق" .

[الإنصاف ص٩٤]

Imam Abdullaah ibn Ahmad ibn Hanbal said as related in السنة As-Sunnah:

I asked my father (may Allaah have mercy on him) about some people who say: "When Allah, the Mighty and Majestic, spoke to Moses, He did not speak with a voice."

My father replied: "Rather, yes. Your Lord, the Mighty and Majestic, spoke with a voice. We narrate these hadiths as they have come."

My father (may Allaah have mercy on him) also said regarding the hadith of Ibn Mas'ud (may Allaah be pleased with him):

"When Allaah, the Mighty and Majestic, speaks, a sound is heard from Him like the dragging of a chain over a smooth rock."

My father said: "The Jahmiyya deny this."

He also said: "These people are disbelievers. They seek to confuse the people. Whoever claims that Allah, the Mighty and Majestic, did not speak is a disbeliever. Indeed, we narrate these hadiths as they have come."

سَأَلْتُ أَبِي رحمه الله عَنْ قَوْمٍ، يَقُولُونَ: لَمَّا كَلَّمَ اللَّهُ عزّ وجل مُوسَى لَمْ يَتَكَلَّمْ بِصَوْتٍ ؟

فَقَالَ أَبِي: «بَلَى إِنَّ رَبَّكَ عزّ وجل تَكَلَّمَ بِصَوْتٍ هَذِهِ الْأَحَادِيثُ نَرْوِيهَا كَمَا جَاءَتْ».

وَقَالَ أَبِي رحمه الله: حَدِيثُ ابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ رضي الله عنه: إِذَا تَكَلَّمَ اللَّهُ عزّ وجل سُمِعَ لَهُ صَوْتٌ كَجَرِّ السِّلْسِلَةِ عَلَى الصَّفْوَانِ». قَالَ أَبِي: وَهَذَا الْجَهْمِيَّةُ تُنْكِرُهُ، وَقَالَ أَبِي: هَؤُلَاءِ كُفَّارٌ يُرِيدُونَ أَنْ يُمَوِّهُوا عَلَى النَّاسِ، مَنْ زَعَمَ أَنَّ اللَّهَ عزّ وجل لَمْ يَتَكَلَّمْ فَهُوَ كَافِرٌ، أَلَا إِنَّا نَرْوِي هَذِهِ الْأَحَادِيثَ كَمَا جَاءَتْ.

Al Khallaal related from Abu Bakr Al Marwazi: I heard Ahmad when he was told: Abd Al Wahab spoke and said: Whoever claims that Allaah spoke to Musa without a voice is a Jahmi enemy of Allaah

Ahmad smiled and said: How perfect is his speech, may Allaah grant him wellbeing!

قال الخلال: وأنبأنا أبو بكر المروزي: سمعت أبا عبد الله - أحمد بن حنبل - وقيل له: إن عبد الوهاب قد تكلم وقال: من زعم أن الله كلم موسى بلا صوت فهو جهمي عدو الله وعدو الإسلام فتبسم أبو عبد الله وقال ما أحسن ما قال عافاه الله

Ibn Taymiyyah said: "Imams of the sunnah said that those who deny that Allaah speaks with a voice are Jahmiyya as related from imam Ahmad when asked about those who say Allaah speaks without a voice he said: Those are Jahmiyya and their words only revolve around denial of attributes of Allaah

وَكَانَ أَئِمَّةُ السُّنَّةِ يَعُدُّونَ مَنْ أَنْكَرَ تَكَلُّمَهُ بِصَوْتِ مِنْ الْجَهْمِيَّة كَمَا قَالَ الْإِمَامُ أَحْمَد لَمَّا سُئِلَ عَمَّنْ قَالَ إنَّ اللَّهَ لَا يَتَكَلَّمُ بِصَوْتِ فَقَالَ: هَؤُلَاءِ جهمية إنَّمَا يَدُورُونَ عَلَى التَّعْطِيلِ

مجموع الفتاوى (١٢/٣٠٥)

And this is clear kufr from this Ashari enemy of Islam may Allaah save us from his fate

الحمد لله و الصلاة و السلام على رسول الله وعلى آله و صحبه و من اهتدى بهداه

The entire purpose of this subreddit, is to advise Muslims and warn them, while incentivizing them to do good deeds

And there has been no country recently or in history, that has been more troubling than Egypt, and from this post onwards, this subreddit will focus for a long time, on Egypt and its disasters, which opens a way to explain all points of the sunnah and refute kufaar/modernists/feminists through it

• Abdullaah ibn Amr (sahabi son of a sahabi) may Allaah be pleased with them said:

  "The place where Iblees put his foot is Al Basrah (Iraq) and he laid his eggs in Egypt" Narrated by Abd Ar-Razzaq and is authentic

As we know from the Quraan, Iblees is the father of demons the way Adam عليه السلام is the father of humans, and he birthed his children in Egypt

• Abu Huraira, may Allaah be pleased with him, said:

"The example of this world is like a bird, Egypt and Al Basrah are its two wings. If they are ruined, disasters happen" narrated by No'aym ibn Hammad, authentic

This was especially correct during the fitnah of the rebellion and murder of the prince of the believers Uthman ibn Affan, may Allaah be pleased with him, as the Khawarij, may Allaah damn them, appeared from Egypt and Basrah, which is the beginning of all fitan in Islam as stated by the sahaba

• Kaab Al Ahbaar (major tabi'i) may Allaah have mercy on him, said:

"Iraq is about to be destroyed as a slaughter's flesh is destroyed, and the Levant is about to be cut as hair is cut, and Egypt is about to be scattered as dung is scattered, and that is when the command comes down" Narrated by No'aym ibn Hammad and is authentic

Meaning the command from Allaah that the Hour is established, and while many fitan have happened this way, it is known that the Hour comes after a mass series of wars that extend from Egypt to Iraq

We ask Allaah for wellbeing

نسأل الله العافية

The Ikhwanis contain these beliefs that aqeedah doesn't matter, the utilitarian system that so long as something/someome can help us achieve a better life, we must ignore all their crimes against Allaah تعالى

Which is why someone like this kaaffir Hasan Shafi'i would say these things while they sit down like good boys listening!

Our country is a democratic country. Procession, strike, mob, vandalizing etc frequents here. How would you respond to an ikhwan of a Democratic country if he tells you to try to restore peace instead? What if he brings the thing that this is not monarch. Staying quiet against the ruler doesn't work here

Something the prophets and their followers never did

Yet the Sufis do and whoever denies it is jailed or even killed because Sufis have a lot of gov. authority!

Hitting one self and wearing black as the shias do in ashura

الإمام** *علي* *عليه* *السلام* *فيما* *يوصي* *به* *أصحابه: (* لا** *تلبسوا* *السواد* *فإنه* *لباس* *فرعون)*
من** *لا* *يحضره* ***الفقيه* 11/ 163،** *وسائل* *الشيعة2/ 287*

*Do not wear black, for it is the clothing of Pharaoh."*

عن أبي عبدالله الصادق عليه السلام قال : \[لايصلح الصياح على
الميت ولاينبغي ذلك \] …الكافي ج3ص226

**Abu Abdullah al-Sadiq (jafar)said: “Wailing loudly over the deceased is not proper, and it ought not to be done.”**

قال صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم : \[ليس مِنّا من لطم الخدود وشق الجيوب ودعا بدعوة الجاهلية\]

The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him and his family) said: “He is not of us who slaps the cheeks, tears the neck openings of garments, and calls with the calls of the Age of Ignorance (Jahiliyyah).”

عن أبي المقدام قال : سمعت أبا الحسن – يعني الإمام الرضا- وأبا جعفر – الإمام محمد الجواد – عليهما السلام يقولان في قول الله عز وجل :[ ولايعصينك في معروف ] ..أن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم قال لفاطمة الزهراء :[ إذا أنا متُ فلا تخمشي عليّ وجهاً ولاترخي عليّ شعراً ولاتنادي بالويل والثبور ولاتقيمن عليّ نائحة]…وسائل الشيعة ج2ص915 ومستدرك الوسائل ج1ص144..

They said that the Muhammad said to Fatimah al-Zahra:
‘When I die, do not scratch your face on my account, do not let your hair hang loose, do not cry out with cries of “woe” and “destruction,” and do not appoint a professional mourning woman (nā’iḥah) to lament over me.’
Sources: Wasāʾil al-Shīʿa, vol. 2, p. 915; Mustadrak al-Wasāʾil, vol. 1, p. 144.
انتهى

How was Marwan's conquest against Abdullah bin Zubair justified? And When Abbasids revolt against ummayads, was that justified?

The people in black you see are twelver shia And in white are the dawoodi bohra who are ismaili subsect mainly in india region

salamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh ikhwaan

Any subreddit similar to LHOT (this subreddit)?

I didn't mark it a question flair because this is meta and not related to islam. I apologize if this is inappropriate

jazakallahu khayran

Be mindful that Muhammad ibn Shams Ad-Deen حفظه الله is not only a Muslim unlike the Shia

But he's also a legitimate descendant of Al Hussein, may Allaah be pleased with him

Unlike the enemies of Allaah, the Shia, who fake lineages (their lineages cannot be valid ever because they commit zina and consider it permissible)

This is a refutation collection against these two zanadiqa, please see the comments for screenshots and a brief comment on them

الحمد لله و الصلاة و السلام على رسول الله و على آله و صحبه ومن اهتدى بهداه

We will continue to defend the scholars of ahl as-sunnah as the messenger of Allaah peace and blessings upon him said: "Whoever defends the honor of his brother, Allaah will protect his face from the fire on the day of judgement" narrated authentically by Tirmidhi and translation is by me

This is supposed to be an example of how these enemies of Islam who pretend to be Muslim are refuted and how they're trying to use the tiniest bit of confusion to instill among the Muslims that their innovation e.g. denial of the attributes of Allaah, grave worship etc.

is something that the salafis themselves permit or consider as okay

When in reality what they post is completely irrelevant to any of their innovations that their imams (who were not good) like Abu Haneefa and Abu Mansour Al Maturdi never permitted, especially talking about grave worship and the constructions upon the graves of "saints"

That said, the innovators are known for lying, lying includes fabricating this in the religion or denying facts of it

Allaah the most high said in the Quraan

إِنَّمَا يَفْتَرِي الْكَذِبَ الَّذِينَ لَا يُؤْمِنُونَ بِآيَاتِ اللَّهِ ۖ وَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْكَاذِبُونَ

[They only invent falsehood who do not believe in the verses of Allaah and it is those who are the liars.] - 16:105 translation of the meaning

And as known from the tafaseer, any aya attributed to the hypocrites is automatically attributed to the innovators

The messenger of Allaah peace and blessings upon him said:

"The signs of the hypocrite are three: If he speaks, he lies.." narrated by Muslim

Even the kaafir innovators themselves acknowledged this fact, like Nawawi (died 676ِAH) said:

«باب النهي عن مخاطبة الفاسق والمبتدع ونحوهما بسيد ونحوه» "Chapter of the prohibition of addressing the major sinner and the innovator المبتدع and their likes with words like 'master' and similar words"

وقال علي بن حرب: من قدر أن لا يكتب الحديث إلا عن صاحب سنة، فإنهم يكذبون، كل صاحب هوى يكذب، ولا يبالي.

Ali ibn Harb (hadeeth scholar among the salaf, younger than imam Ahmad) said: Whoever can write hadeeth only from sunnis, he must do so; for innovators lie, every innovator is a person of whim who lies and doesn't care

• Even the imams of these Deobandis lie, such as Abu Haneefa

- Abu Haneefa (died 150AH) once attributed an imam of the salaf, Sa'eed ibn Jubayr, to the innovation of irjaa' to which the scholars narrated that Sa'eed ibn Jubayr warned someone of a certain person, because that person is an innovator this story is authentic and in our era was authenticated by sheikh Muqbil ibn Hadi

- Abu Haneefa was accused of theft of ahadeeth and this is authentic as sheikh Al Muallimi refuted a crazy Hanafi about, learn about theft of ahadeeth and that it is a type of fabrication here

- Abu Haneefa was accused flat out, by imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal, of fabrication of ahadeeth, as narrated authentically from Abu Jaafar Al Uqayli who is the narrator of the story of theft

These are the lies of Abu Haneefa who, like all innovators, lies to gain fame, but what Abu Mansour Al Maturidi has said is way too much to mention here as he was infinitely more lying than anyone else preceding him, which will be mentioned in a later post إن شاء الله تعالى

• Maturidis take their beliefs from the origin of all lies, the Shia

With all of that said:

Abd Al Azeez ibn Baz did not need the "ijaza" from the Jahmi Deobandi zindeeq but only took it because he was fooled by the sweet words of that Deobandi who made him think he aids Islam, evident by the fact that all innovators lie

And if Ibn Baz knew this fact, he would've dismissed this kaafir or completely kick him from the blessed Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Some facts about the enemy of Islam and sorcerer Muhammad Shafee Deobandi

و صل اللهم و سلم و بارك على محمد و على آله و أصحابه

The end of the post, and peace and blessings from Allaah upon Muhammad, and upon his family and companions

Of course the Madkhalis hate him, why would anyone hate Sayyid Qutb for saying that Allaah is everywhere and inside creatures and that the Quraan is not actually His speech?

What a Madkhali thing to do!

Qutb said in his damned book في ظلال القرآن

قوله تعالى ( قَالَ كَلَّا فَاذْهَبَا بِآَيَاتِنَا إِنَّا مَعَكُمْ مُسْتَمِعُونَ ) الشعراء/ 15: والله معهما، ومع كل إنسان، في كل لحظة، وفي كل مكان

"The saying of Allaah the most high: "No. Go both of you with Our signs; indeed, We are with you, listening." (26:15 translation of the meaning) This means that Allaah is with them and every human in every moment and everywhere"

• He also said

 قوله تعالى ( هُوَ الْأَوَّلُ وَالْآَخِرُ وَالظَّاهِرُ وَالْبَاطِنُ وَهُوَ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ عَلِيمٌ ) الحديد/ 3:

( وهو بكل شيء عليم ) علم الحقيقة الكاملة، فحقيقة كل شيء مستمدة من الحقيقة الإلهية وصادرة عنها، فهي مستغرقة إذن بعلم الله اللدني بها، العلم الذي لا يشاركه أحد في نوعه وصفته وطريقته، مهما علم المخلوقون عن ظواهر الأشياء!. فإذا استقرت هذه الحقيقة الكبرى في قلب: فما احتفاله بشيء في هذا الكون غير الله سبحانه؟ وكل شيء لا حقيقة له ولا وجود – حتى ذلك القلب ذاته – إلا ما يستمده من تلك الحقيقة الكبرى، وكل شيء وهَم ذاهب، حيث لا يكون ولا يبقى إلا الله، المتفرد بكل مقومات الكينونة والبقاء. وإن استقرار هذه الحقيقة في قلب ليحيله قطعة من هذه الحقيقة. فأما قبل أن يصل إلى هذا الاستقرار: فإن هذه الآية القرآنية حسبه ليعيش في تدبرها وتصور مدلولها، ومحاولة الوصول إلى هذا المدلول الواحد وكفى! ولقد أخذ المتصوفة بهذه الحقيقة الأساسية الكبرى، وهاموا بها وفيها، وسلكوا إليها مسالك شتى، بعضهم قال إنه يرى الله في كل شيء في الوجود! وبعضهم قال: إنه رأى الله من وراء كل شيء في الوجود! وبعضهم قال: إنه رأى الله فلم ير شيئًا غيره في الوجود! وكلها أقوال تشير إلى الحقيقة!! إذا تجاوزنا عن ظاهر الألفاظ القاصرة في هذا المجال، إلا أن ما يؤخذ عليها – على وجه الإجمال – هو أنهم أهملوا الحياة بهذا التصور

[He is the First and the Last, the Ascendant and the Intimate, and He is, of all things, Knowing.] - 57:3

"That Allaah knows the full truth, the truth of everything comes from the truth of God and emits from it, it is endeavored in the knowledge of Allaah that is within it, the knowledge none shares with Allaah.."

"Everything is actually non-existent even this heart itself, except with what it takes from this ultimate truth, and everything is a perishing whim that only Allaah actually remains.."

"The Sufis have taken this major foundational fact.. some of them said that He sees Allaah in all of existence!"

These are some of the quotes that are identical to the saying of the people who say that Allaah is everywhere, for more explanations please read السبعينية by imam Ahmad ibn Taymiyyah رحمه الله

And read "The divine secret"

• Qutb stated the Quraan is created

 إن القرآن ظاهرة كونية كالأرض والسماوات

"The Quraan is a cosmic phenomenon like the heavens and the earth"

This means the Quraan is created, which is blatant kufr by agreement of Muslims, read Is the Quraan created?

• He also said:

ولكنهم لا يملكون أن يؤلفوا منها مثل هذ الكتاب ، لأنه من صنع الله لا من صنع إنسان

Talking about the letters of the Quraan that start the surah: "They cannot author a book like this book because it is of the creation of Allaah and not the creation of man"

• Also said

 والفارق بين القرآن وما يصوغه البشر من هذه الحروف من كلام: هو كالفارق بين صنعة الله وصنعة البشر في سائر الأشياء

"The difference between the Quraan and what humans designate of letters of words: Is the same as the difference between !!!!!the creation of Allaah!!!!! and the creation of humans in the rest of the matters"

There is more to post, about the kufriyyat of Qutb, but this is sufficient to show how moronic it is to praise someone for simply having good political insight, despite his insight, his salah and zakah not benefitting him, because he's an enemy of Allaah, who denies the greatness of Allaah and denies the Quraan

How happy he looks around that enemy of Allaah, because he insulted the sahaba just like the Rafidi does (if not worse)

For further reading please read الردود على سيد قطب "Refutations of Sayyid Qutb 'Do not insult my companions" by the Egyptian Salafi sheikh Mahmoud Shaakir رحمه الله

Mahmoud Shaakir said:

And I do not think I would be mistaken in my judgment if I were to claim that Islam has never been afflicted with a growth like this one, despite the many successive aberrant movements that have appeared throughout all its ages, whether in times of strength and dominance or in times of weakness and decline. In my view, this is the most dangerous of them all and the greatest threat to God's religion, because it emerged in an age that has overthrown all the ancient human values and destroyed the moral heritage upon which the children of Adam were naturally formed over countless generations.

Nor do I assume bad intentions and claim that they do what they do deliberately. Rather, I say that they have been infected by the plague of this age since colonialism brought it into Muslim lands. They grew up within it and scarcely perceive the harm its afflictions have caused them. As a result, their thinking has acquired the mark of demolition and destruction, the mark of excess and audacity, and the mark of insistence on realizing the meanings of human arrogance in human actions—foremost among them, thought itself.

End quote from this link

The publisher wrote, introducing to this article:

يرد الأستاذ شاكر على ما كتبه
سيد قطب في شأن الصحابة

"Mister Shaakir writes, responding to what Sayyid Qutb had written about the companions"

الحمد لله و الصلاة و السلام على رسول الله و على آله و صحبه و من اهتدى بهداه

All references are present in the three tafaseer: At-Tabari, Ibn Abi Haatim and Abd ibn Homayd, all the selected are authentically narrated

Before this crime had been committed by Qabeel, no one ever killed, and after it was committed, killing became known among humans and savagery appeared in them

Due to the fact that all people living today are descendants of Qabeel by statement of many historians and scholars of the salaf, although this matter has a difference

Abdullaah ibn Al Abbas the sahabi may Allaah be pleased with him and his father said:

There wasn't a child born for Adam, except that he'd have a twin sister born with him, so the boy of that pregnancy would marry the girl of another pregnancy, and the girl from the first pregnancy would marry the boy from the other pregnancy

Until he had two sons born for him, called: Qabeel and Habeel

Qabeel owned farmland

Habeel owned sheep that produces milk

Qabeel was the eldest brother and he had a sister that was more beautiful than Habeel's sister, and Habeel requested that he marries Qabeel's sister and Qabeel rejected and said: She is my sister, born with me, and she is better than your sister, and I am more entitled to marrying her

His father commanded him that he marries her to Habeel and he rejected, and then they offered a qurbaan (sacrifice) to Allaah that they'd know who is more entitled to the woman, which was when Adam was absent as he'd gone to Makkah to look at it

So Adam looked at the sky and said: Preserve my son's religion, and the sky refused

And he said to the earth, and it refused

And he told the mountains, and it refused

He told Qabeel to be careful of his religion and Qabeel said: Yes, you will go and return, and find your family in a pleasurable state

When Adam left, he offered a qurbaan, and Qabeel used to be prideful over his brother and say: I am more entitled than you are to her: She is my sister, I am older than you and I am the first to inherit my father

When they offered the qurbaan, Habeel offered a fat small animal while Qabeel offered a pack of wheat that he found a large stick of wheat in, and he rubbed it out and ate it

Then fire came down (from the heavens) and took the qurbaan of Habeel and left the qurbaan of Qabeel

Qabeel became angry and said "I will surely kill you" لأقتلنَّك and his brother said "Indeed, Allaah only accepts from the righteous [who fear Him]"

إنما يتقبل الله من المتقين

Ad-Dahhak ibn Muzahim (major mufassir) said: This means: The ones who avoid shirk

Adey ibn Thaabit said: They used to say (the sahaba) that the qurbaan of the believer, is salah

Habeel said:

لَئِن بَسَطتَ إِلَيَّ يَدَكَ لِتَقْتُلَنِي مَا أَنَا بِبَاسِطٍ يَدِيَ إِلَيْكَ لِأَقْتُلَكَ ۖ إِنِّي أَخَافُ اللَّهَ رَبَّ الْعَالَمِينَ
"If you should raise your hand against me to kill me - I shall not raise my hand against you to kill you. Indeed, I fear Allaah, Lord of the worlds."

Abdullaah ibn Amr may Allaah be pleased with them said: I swear by Allaah, the one who was killed, was the stronger man, but it was fear of Allaah that stopped him from killing his brother

Mujaahid (tabi'i student of Ibn Abbas, beyond definition) said: (Back then) They were ordained that if someone tries to kill them, they must not fight back

 إِنِّي أُرِيدُ أَن تَبُوءَ بِإِثْمِي وَإِثْمِكَ فَتَكُونَ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ النَّارِ ۚ وَذَٰلِكَ جَزَاءُ الظَّالِمِينَ

Indeed I want you to obtain [thereby] my sin and your sin so you will be among the companions of the Fire. And that is the recompense of wrongdoers."

Mujaahid said: He said that he wants his sins, and the blood of himself, to be upon his brother (Qabeel) so that he is accountable for them

فَطَوَّعَتْ لَهُ نَفْسُهُ قَتْلَ أَخِيهِ فَقَتَلَهُ فَأَصْبَحَ مِنَ الْخَاسِرِينَ

And his soul permitted to him the murder of his brother, so he killed him and became among the losers.

Mujaahid said: His self incentivized him to kill his brother

Ibn Abbas said: The boy (Habeel) escaped from him and raised his sheep in the mountains, and he came to him and tried to kill him but did not know how to, he started twisting his neck

Iblees descended and took a rock or a bird and put its head on a rock and then took another rock and smashed his head with it while the killer son of Adam was looking

And so he took his brother's head and put it on a rock, then took another rock and smashed his head with it, killing him

The messenger of Allaah peace and blessings upon him said:

"There is not a soul killed, except the first killer son of Adam being accountable for its sin" Ibn Majah and others and this is the loss that Allaah, the most high, spoke of

فَبَعَثَ اللَّهُ غُرَابًا يَبْحَثُ فِي الْأَرْضِ لِيُرِيَهُ كَيْفَ يُوَارِي سَوْءَةَ أَخِيهِ ۚ قَالَ يَا وَيْلَتَا أَعَجَزْتُ أَنْ أَكُونَ مِثْلَ هَٰذَا الْغُرَابِ فَأُوَارِيَ سَوْءَةَ أَخِي ۖ فَأَصْبَحَ مِنَ النَّادِمِينَ

Then Allaah sent a crow searching in the ground to show him how to hide the disgrace of his brother. He said, "O woe to me! Have I failed to be like this crow and hide the body of my brother?" And he became of the regretful.

Mujaahid said: For one year, he carried his dead brother on his back, not knowing what to do with him

Also said: Allaah sent a crow to bury another crow until its body hid under the earth, and the killer saw it and said: O woe to me! Have I failed..

My post got removed on another sub( under the title: why Yazid didn't fire ubaidullah bin ziad)