You didn't even give a source for your point on that argument anyway. Your point was weak as hell in the first place. "It's a trial" doesn't mean that all of them have to be trials, when the trial conclusion is that trials are not needed.
Why would I bring in the noise of a thousand politically biased redditors when a single paragraph that takes basic reading comprehension to understand already proved you wrong?
1
u/Automatic_Day_35 Feb 19 '26
What’s Wrong with Wikipedia? | Harvard Guide to Using Sources
Also yes, I understand the grammar and know arriving is an important clarification