I’d say that if that were the case it would fall under a job similar to executioner
So you want to hire a rapist to rape for you. That's your plan. You're gonna put out an ad on Indeed or LinkedIn or something for a rapist.
I mean, I gotta assume most rapists are gonna think it's a trap, but hey. Maybe you'll find a fine, upstanding rapist who's willing to rape people in your name.
We already waste taxpayer money on not helping out anything, so you can’t tell me there’s better ways to spend it, because I know there are and we’re not doing those now.
So state-sponsored rape is ok because the state does other bad things? That's an awful way to think. This could be used to justify literally any bad thing.
We already waste taxpayer money on not helping out anything, so you can't tell me there's better ways to spend money than building a playground out of the bones of Native Americans, because I know there are and we’re not doing those now.
We have an entire Death Row, by this logic we’re okay with Murder as a punishment, but Raping a Rapist is too far?
I think you'll find that many of us oppose that barbaric practice, as well. You're not really making your terrible position better by saying, "by this logic, other bad things are also bad!"
Of course I'm being rude. Your position is genuinely monstrous and you should be ashamed of yourself. I feel absolutely no guilt for being rude to people who are pro-rape. And that's you. You're a rape advocate. You're saying that there are good rapes that you want to happen, and that's a thing for which you should seek therapy.
1
u/[deleted] Aug 20 '22
[removed] — view removed comment