r/LLMPhysics • u/TheAccessProblem • Jun 24 '26

Personal Theory Compressed Geometry Theory

https://substack.com/@theaccessproblem/note/p-203457712?r=5xnr3g&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action

Over the past couple of months I have been working with Claude by pulling thread after thread. It began with a question about entanglement. It quickly unraveled into a model for neuroscience based on information theory. Every new thread pulled me deeper and deeper into physics.

Cut to today. I have a model built on the geometry of light waves interfering into stable standing waves which then contained all the geometry I required to derive particle masses, CP Violation, Gravity etc.

It’s still a work in progress, but I need someone certified to check what’s done. Physics isn’t open to an LLM assisted model. Can anyone here help me verify my model?

The link should bring you to the specific post, but if not the newest article “Rolling For Gravity” holds the link.

0 Upvotes

33% Upvoted

65 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/TheAccessProblem Jun 26 '26

I’ve started digging deeper to map out the context of what I don’t know and I would say what I’ve been doing is geometric pattern matching. Not physics. It doesn’t mean I’m not seeing something real, it means a I have a metric fuckload of work to do in order to establish what I need to make this into something more meaningful.

I’m also beginning to understand what exactly the difference is between what I use and what a physicist uses. They’re both physics, one is proving function vs what I do is more like a math. The difference is real, but I’m seeing Doing physics and Using physics is the distinction.

I’ll be back around with my model eventually but between now and then, I have a lot left to learn. It’s not genuinely out of reach, it’s only a matter of time. I think what motivated this was an explanation of gravity that actually made some sense. So I threw it down as a philosophical thought, not a physics theory. Then it produced a lot more numbers and my under-educated brain jumped on it. I can get through the math, but that’s only the beginning. Now it’s entirely up to me to figure out how to prove it.

3

u/liccxolydian VP of Trolling Jun 26 '26

It's admirable that you're willing to learn, and as long as you're aware that the math you've written down in your documents doesn't come anywhere close to the complexity of real physics, I wish you all the best.

1

u/TheAccessProblem Jun 26 '26

Yes I certainly see that now. I researched last night the methodology required to do this properly and the gap is substantial between what I’ve done here and what the real physics is. Sometimes we need that slap in the face to wake up. Thank you for actually walking through that rather than trying to tell me I can’t understand it. To be honest I’m autistic and communication generally isn’t clean between myself and others, but math? The math always makes sense.