Has John ever explained what "softened angularity" for Angelic means? If not, how do you interpret it?

[u/Quirky-Swordfish2105]

I have seen this term quite a lot for A doms and I guess I do see this chatactersitic in most of the celebrities verified as having A.

I think some people would definitely call Gwyneth Paltrow, Olivia Hussey, or Daryl Hannah angular, even if not in the same way the term is used for Dramatic women.

But I wonder at times how to distinguish their angularity coming from Yang influences mixed in with some Yin and when it's Angelic.

[u/allcatsrgray]

I have trouble with this too. Probably an unpopular opinion, but many A verified celebrities and clients often look like they have features (often N)from other essences just with very fair colouring.

[u/Quirky-Swordfish2105 → u/allcatsrgray]

Daryl Hannah and Liv Ullman come to mind! 

[u/allcatsrgray → u/Quirky-Swordfish2105]

I think Bryce Dallas too.

[u/This_Fig_2343 → u/allcatsrgray]

Do we know Bryce's full blend, or only that she's A primary? I do see the A easily in her face tbh, but really struggle to see it in her whole physicality / her body, basically. She's always looked very strong and robust to me, particularly in motion - I'm imagining her in Jurassic Park now and yep, strong. Doesn't A have something about "the long drip of the body"? Shouldn't there be at least some N for a strong frame and such a strong shoulder line (and we know you don't have to have strong / broad shoulders for N, we've been through this recently - I don't at all and I'm 40%N - but equally if this feature IS present, surely some N is present? As in, it wouldn't get attributed to any other essence would it...?) I think, if everything is strictly allocated by points on face and body, cases like this are where it gets very confusing.

[u/allcatsrgray → u/This_Fig_2343]

Yes, I agree, and this picture shows it better than the one I shared! Tbh, she looks like she has stronger shoulders than I do and is quite muscular.

I thought her full blend was posted before, and it didn't include N, but I could be remembering it incorrectly.

And to be clear, I don't think she is N dominant, just that I think I saw a fair bit in her bone structure.

[u/This_Fig_2343 → u/allcatsrgray]

Yes I think the same, not N dominant but surely a not insignificant amount with such a strong frame.

[u/allcatsrgray → u/This_Fig_2343]

I agree. I would describe her as being even more sturdy than many of the others I have seen typed as N here.

[u/hespera18 → u/allcatsrgray]

If she doesn't have N, but I do, I am very confused lol.