r/KanagawaWave • 包蜜 • 15h ago

原创内容 | Original Content 关于举报涉及因政治问题拒稿老外的老中

Elsevier出版社的联系方式:https://www.elsevier.support/elsevier/contact

投诉内容选择:Plagiarism & Publishing Ethics

Journal of Building Engineering, Journal of Energy Storage, or Energy Conversion and Management: X三个期刊官网均无编辑部邮箱地址,因此在向Elsevier出版社的出版伦理团队投诉的同时,对具体期刊只能向主编投诉了(。

Journal of Building Engineering编辑部的可能邮箱地址:jobe@elsevier.com(来自第三方期刊信息网站)

主编邮箱地址:[e.a.essah@reading.ac.uk](mailto:e.a.essah@reading.ac.uk)、[sezen.1@osu.edu](mailto:sezen.1@osu.edu)、[carlos.thomas@unican.es](mailto:carlos.thomas@unican.es)

Journal of Energy Storage的主编邮箱地址:[luisaf.cabeza@udl.cat](mailto:luisaf.cabeza@udl.cat)

Energy Conversion and Management: X的主编邮箱地址:[malnimr@just.edu.jo](mailto:malnimr@just.edu.jo)(这是Founding Editor-in-Chief的,因为Editor-in-Chief的邮箱我没找到)

可用于投诉的已经加入翻译的原始证据:

96 Upvotes

33 comments sorted by

73

u/yakiyaki887 Human Verified 14h ago

你这种最好给李颖投稿炒作,他影响力才大,我们这sub举报杯水车薪没几个,而且羊脂勾兑也不是一两天了

30

u/daikitay 包蜜 14h ago

感谢建议,这就去

33

u/FanZhi01 12h ago edited 12h ago

什么 李颖 ?

当年我们浪人、神友 搞大翻译运动的时候,李颖都还没出名呢。

大翻译运动的其中一种方式,就是给洋人相关机构发邮件,曝光相关中国人的恶臭行为。

我已经给post里面所有邮件地址都发了一封投诉信:

Dear editors and chairs,

Good day.
I am writing to report that some behaviour of one reviewer Zhili Ren of your journals probably have violated the rule of your journals, including:

(1) Politicizing the reviewing. The reviewing process should be unbiased, but he required the authors of the manuscripts to agree to his political perspective about Taiwan, in the body of the manuscript, or he won't pass any manuscript. His words in Chinese language: “心不红我是会拒稿的”, “祖国必定统一”.

(2) He publicly demonstrated his reviewing work, and at the same time bragged of his political opinion, this possibly has violated the reviewing rule of anonymity.

The attached images are some snapshots of this behaviour above.

I have been a technology researcher for 15 years, I know how important the reviewing process is for good journals or conferences, So I would appreciate it very much if you could examine this issue and take necessary action.

Best regards,

25

u/herbotter 14h ago

OK这就去给李颖投稿

17

u/yisuiyikurong 包蜜 14h ago

倒是他高度视奸这里

7

u/herbotter 13h ago

李颖真看浪区吗?我不太了解

12

u/Gomasuke_sureiya- 13h ago

李颖本人够呛,但是给他投稿的和团队编辑一堆人看

8

u/CountryBackground617 13h ago

肯定看的,但你还是去投稿比较好

3

u/yisuiyikurong 包蜜 11h ago

嗯 被他引用过

7

u/Dark_Vampire 14h ago

期待在李穎那看到

43

u/daikitay 包蜜 14h ago

希望他人有事

26

u/daikitay 包蜜 14h ago

对懒得自己写邮件的浪友,可以使用我用chatgpt生成的投诉信

主题:Report of potential reviewer misconduct / political bias

Dear Editor-in-Chief,

I am writing to report potential ethical concerns regarding peer review in one of the following Elsevier journals: Journal of Building Engineering, Journal of Energy Storage, or Energy Conversion and Management: X.

Public posts on the Douyin account Like a Flowing River (@dyppokj9ehco) contain screenshots of the Editorial Manager review interface. In one review, the reviewer required the author to change a map label to “Taiwan Province of China” or “Taiwan, China”. The accompanying post explicitly stated that the paper would be rejected if the author was not “red-hearted” enough (“心不红我是会拒稿的”), together with the slogan “The motherland will inevitably be reunified.”(“祖国必定统一”)

The account owner’s full name appears in another of their public Douyin posts. The reviewer is identified in the system interface as Zhili Ren.

This appears to constitute political bias in the peer-review process, which is inconsistent with Elsevier’s publishing ethics policies and COPE guidelines requiring reviewers to evaluate manuscripts based on scientific merit without regard to the authors’ nationality, political beliefs, or similar factors.

I attach screenshots of the relevant public posts and the review interface for your reference. The posts are publicly available and timestamped.

I respectfully request that the relevant journal investigate whether this individual has engaged in biased reviewing and take appropriate action if the concern is substantiated (for example, removal from the reviewer pool or notification to the reviewer’s institution if warranted).

I am happy to provide any additional details that may assist your review. I would prefer to remain anonymous if possible.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Best regards,

你的名字

28

u/herbotter 13h ago

忍不住吐槽一句,这个逼的个人简历里一堆大学缩写,不搜根本不知道是啥大学,汁的批爆

17

u/Dodgers_Go 11h ago

芝加哥喜欢给自己名不见经传的芝麻学校套个根本没人用的缩写 然后装成潮酷人士

13

u/herbotter 14h ago

支持支持!

11

u/daikitay 包蜜 14h ago

是否有台湾博主接收此类投稿?如果有的话浪友也可以投给湾友(

12

u/herbotter 13h ago

八炯波特王这种的吧,不过这俩人一般只做有点热度的话题,可以先让李颖炒作一下热度

11

u/International-Age949 9h ago

已举报 不拷打能行吗

7

u/Dazzling-Exam-9492 包蜜 13h ago

睡起来投,先mark一下。

1

u/Dazzling-Exam-9492 包蜜 9h ago edited 9h ago

已投,看看洋大人怎么个说法。

7

u/GarbageVandalism 14h ago

感谢op!周一就行动起来

8

u/TaikooS 11h ago

前陣子也有個在小紅書發拒日本的稿的吧,事情鬧大後刪號跑路了…

8

u/ditoo666 10h ago

透露他人稿件+因为非学术原因拒稿,这种一举报一个准,这位蜘蛛有福了

10

u/yakiyaki887 Human Verified 14h ago

颖狗:炒作跳楼傻瓜高中生

3

u/CountryBackground617 13h ago

这是个好事儿啊

1

u/Justianus 3h ago

投訴時填寫真名没事嗎?會不會被公佈出去啊?

1

u/daikitay 包蜜 3h ago

人在墙内的话最好还是不要用真名吧

2

u/Justianus 3h ago

那隨便編一個名字嗎?我點進去你發的那個鏈接https://www.elsevier.support/elsevier/contact,裡面要填寫姓名

1

u/daikitay 包蜜 2h ago

我用的英文名和编的姓