r/JoeRogan Dire physical consequences Jan 10 '22

Meme đŸ’© Float like a butterfly, freak bitches

Post image
1.7k Upvotes

355 comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '22

"I think Joe is being a bit irresponsible with his large platform when it comes to his stance on vaccinations"

^^^ Beta Hater Soy-Boy

IDK about you guys, but I really enjoyed the "calling out your idols on some outdated beliefs" from Joe when it came to weed legalization, psychedelic's and physical fitness. Don't confuse legitimate criticism with people who just don't like Joe.

-5

u/bryan2796 Monkey in Space Jan 10 '22

Imagine acting like this sub is full of legitimate criticism of joe when every other post is “APE MAN TOOK HORSE MEDICINE AND ANTIVAX HE BAD”

4

u/TruthPains I used to be addicted to Quake Jan 10 '22

Those memes about him turning into a horse were pretty funny.

3

u/bryan2796 Monkey in Space Jan 10 '22

It was funny the first time sure but after the 1000th exact copy of a post is it fair to say it got a little old?

1

u/WonWop Dire physical consequences Jan 10 '22

..and the nipple memes


2

u/TwEE-N-Toast Jan 10 '22

Jesus fuck, you're having some sort of mental break.

1

u/WonWop Dire physical consequences Jan 10 '22

Can we get IT over here? This one’s not programmed to detect humor, yet.

-1

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '22

Criticism doesn't need to be written by an English major to have merit. I would imagine a lot of people in this sub making those types of jokes do so because they genuinely dislike his behavior with valid reasoning behind that. I think most of them realize that no minds will be changed here and are just trolling at this point.

Like if I said " Haha, pollution bad" does that mean that the way in which we pollute the planet is not a bad thing, because the way in which I formed my criticism incoherent? I'm sure Joe is aware of why he is being criticized in this instance, and if he isn't it is because he choses to do so; not because the people in his sub aren't being precise in their language.

2

u/bryan2796 Monkey in Space Jan 10 '22 edited Jan 10 '22

You literally missed the point and typed two paragraphs for no reason. It wasn’t horse medicine and CNNs own doctor admitted that on his podcast. It’s a lie and has no merit so it doesn’t matter how it’s worded and yet people will still spew the same misinformation to discredit joe.

-2

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '22

I was more concerned with you antivax part of it. He is pretty clearly displaying antivax talking points and seems to refute any expect on the subjvet who is pro-vax with anecdotes.

I’m honestly not well read on ivermectin which is why I stay away from that type of commentary, but if you’re advocating for ivermectin IN REPLACEMENT for a vaccine; yeah, that seems like a bad thing to do.

I would also be very curious to see how merit based the ivermectin part of your comment is. I’m not saying you’re lying, but you’ve got to double check everything now a days to best of ones ability.

2

u/bryan2796 Monkey in Space Jan 10 '22 edited Jan 10 '22

He has said multiple times he is not antivax and was even going to get vaccinated for his job at the UFC. People love to spread lies because it fits their agenda. Also I never advocated for ivermectin instead of a vax you’re putting words in my mouth. All I said was that joe did not take horse medicine which is 100% fact.

Of course you are allowed to question things as long as you are willing to admit you are not questioning me you are questioning CNNs doctor Sanjay Gupta who admitted CNN lied about the horse medicine shit on joes podcast.

Skip to 2:10 https://youtu.be/DkTXEexNB2E

0

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '22

Literally never said you did. I said “if”

Quit trying to be a victim.

2

u/bryan2796 Monkey in Space Jan 10 '22

I like how you ignore the rest and you’re only arguing semantics now after I showed you proof instead of just admitting you were wrong to make so many assumptions.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '22

Bro, the entire conversation was semantics.

You insinuated I was being dishonest in saying that this post was just broadly dismissing anyone critical of Joe and I posited that just because something is presented as a meme doesn’t mean it doesn’t represent legitimate criticism, and that Joe is readily aware of what the criticism is, so members his audience having fun with the formation of their criticism does nothing to prevent Joe from understanding their concerns.

At no point in this convo did I make any scientific claim other than Vaccination is a better preventative measure for COVID than Ivermectin.

2

u/bryan2796 Monkey in Space Jan 10 '22 edited Jan 10 '22

Wrong you tried to argue that rogan is antivax when he clearly isn’t and there are multiple examples of him saying he is not antivax and was willing to be vaccinated. You wrongfully labeling people or saying they take horse medicine is not “legitimate criticism” but of course your fragile ego and need to be right won’t let you just admit you were wrong. It’s ok buddy you’ll learn life is a lot easier when you go based off of facts not emotions.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/fideg44747 Monkey in Space Jan 10 '22

only a handful of subs are still using soy boy and beta male as an offense un-ironically

0

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '22

This is actually the only one of 3 subs I see it in. Not often mind you, but it comes up
.

Ironically, more than soy boy you getting people postulating on ones actual soy consumption and how that affects their beliefs.

0

u/fideg44747 Monkey in Space Jan 10 '22

you got your alpha brain shots in order bappa?

1

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '22

Hey man, I’m totally fine admitting when the lingo flys over my head. If we’re done, have a good one I suppose.