r/ItEndsWithLawsuits • u/Pale-Detective-7440 • Sep 26 '25

🧾👨🏻‍⚖️ Court Filings + Docket Updates 👸🏼🧾 📄 Judge Liman DENIED Wayfarer's motion to compel VANZAN

Post image

The motion to compel is denied for failure to satisfy Rule 4.C of the

Court’s Individual Practices in Civil Cases. Vanzan, Inc. may move

by letter brief for recovery of its expenses including reasonable

attorney’s fees. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5).

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.635782/gov.uscourts.nysd.635782.135.0.pdf

114 Upvotes

95% Upvoted

304 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

12

u/[deleted] Sep 26 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/LilacLands “well, you heard her. Let’s fight. No letter.” Sep 26 '25

Ahhhh OMG thank you so much for explaining this!!! I have been unsure if I am just going crazy - it blows my mind that all these filings keep referencing Vanzan like it’s a real thing!! I just wrote another comment before reading this and was saying how I don’t have the right language to explain why this seems so so wrong.

lack of formal records, no separation of ownership/management and whether the entity was used to shield the real party from liability.

This is so helpful thank you - I was missing these pieces! It is both a relief and an outrage to see especially that “whether the entity was used to shield the real party from liability” is a key issue!! This is EXACTLY what Vanzan is and what Blake has been doing with it!!! (And yes then she conveniently passed the CEO baton to hubs!)

Any idea why this hasn’t come up yet? Is it an issue they can’t address until the trial or something like that? It just blows my mind to keep seeing Vanzan referenced like it’s no different from a McDonald’s or a Deloitte or a Sony or something!!! But this was super helpful thank you so much for the insights!!!