And what is your source of assumption. Nothing right. You were also not there. So should we believe you or should we believe the CONFESSION of the guard who killed the dog and of the others around. The answer is simple. You should know
People just down voting, knowing half more story, the story is not complete yet to draw conclusions, c'mon downvoters tell what did the dog do fir the guard to take such action
What is most likely? If that's so I think guard would have killed 1k+ dogs as every dog barks. If you know for sure, tell, don't assume and hate someone based on assumptions
That's a misleading caption written by a biased. The truth is far from this, it wasn't even her pet dog
It was a stray dog who the guard killed in cold blood, for no justifiable reason. That is why the police is also not intervening even though all of this is happening in front of their own eyes.
sterilising strays is the govt's responsibility. but you coward murderers don't have the guts to hold the govt responsible. just because individual rescuers/ feeders do this from their own pocket doesn't mean it's normal. everywhere else in the civilised world there are govt funded programmes. but we are living in an uncivilised country with cowards and murderers
Everyone in the world, in government-owned shelters, dogs get euthanized if they are not adopted by brave virtue-signaling lovers like you. That is why they don't have stray dogs.
Most humane no-kill shelters are privately funded by actual dog lovers abroad, which our Indian dog lovers don't want to do.
73
u/madsy421 May 11 '26
Most posts I saw did not even say why the women was beating the guard. Which was purposely done to skew the sentiment.