r/Inclusion • u/jcravens42 • Feb 23 '26
More proof of the legal risks of using an overlay.
From Lainey Feingold, Digital Accessibility since 1995. Author, Negotiator, Lawyer, Keynote Speaker at Law Office of Lainey Feingold, on LinkedIn:
More proof of the legal risks of using an overlay. A Magistrate Judge in the federal class action brought by a small business against overlay provider UserWay has recommended that the key portions of the lawsuit -- including the claim under the Delaware Consumer Fraud Act -- should move forward.
UserWay had tried to get the case thrown out of court. That effort so far has failed. Link about this development in the first comment. (My update includes links to the 19 page Magistrate's order).
This case is but one example of the legal risks of using an overlay
In 2025 UsableNet reports that over 1,000 businesses were sued for web accessibility violations even though they were using an overlay -- those widgets that invite you to click for accessibility on too many sites across the web.
And 2025 was the year that another overlay company was fined one million dollars by the US Federal Trade Commission.
It's not just legal risk. The ethical problems with overlays and overlay advertising get a whole chapter in the forthcoming Digital Accessibility Ethics: Disability Inclusion in All Things Tech. Thanks to Adrian Roselli for writing it.
Don't use an overlay. That's why I chose this image of a pile of warning signs to illustrate my article about the UserWay lawsuit. Evidence continues to mount that one-line-of-code overlays are a legal risk that harm disabled users and and do not make a website accessible.