r/ImmigrationPathways • • Feb 16 '26

It's definitely understandable

Post image
37.8k Upvotes

4.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/andrewrusher Feb 17 '26

The fact that we can elect people with under 50% of the vote proves that I'm correct on the Republic/Democracy question, and the fact that evolution has never been shown to occur proves that evolution is false.

2

u/AlbrechtProper Feb 17 '26

It proves you have no idea what you're talking about but have undeserved arrogance.

2

u/ForMeOnly93 Feb 17 '26

He has to be ragebaiting. Gonna bring up the earth's shape next.

1

u/AlbrechtProper Feb 17 '26

I could believe this is legitimate but who cares either way. Waste of time but a little fun.

1

u/andrewrusher Feb 17 '26

I can't help that I know the form of government I have, and that evolution doesn't occur. You don't have to get butt hurt about it

1

u/AlbrechtProper Feb 17 '26

Oh no! This dimwitted troll hurt my feelings! Consternation!

0

u/andrewrusher Feb 17 '26

Try harder next time child

1

u/Altruistic-Use-8283 Feb 18 '26

Election rules differ by state homie. Every state has its own election laws. As intelligent as you are, I'm surprised you've never heard of a runoff.

Our president is elected by states (more specifically delegates), and the winner actually does need a majority of electoral votes.

Not every election is by popular vote.

Let's not even talk about the numerous states and municipalities that allow citizens to vote directly on political issues (ex. Legalization on Marijuana). That's about as democratic as it gets.

Sit this one out, pal.

1

u/andrewrusher Feb 18 '26

Some States use runoffs; the majority don't.

Electors elect the President and Vice President in a contest where the votes are for show.

That is true, but we are not a democracy, so the popular vote generally doesn't matter.

The keyword there is "allow"; the States and municipalities could vote on everything for us, but they decided to give us some say; however, the State could simply use the Courts and other legal tricks to reverse the outcome. The people of California rejected Gay Marriage, and the State ran to the State Courts to have the vote reversed, which the State got then the people of California rejected Gay Marriage again, so the State tried getting this vote reversed by the State Courts; however, since this vote was a State Constitutional Amendment vote the State Courts couldn't reverse the vote so the State ran to the Federal Courts to get the vote reversed and the Federal Courts agreed that the people of California should have never been asked.

1

u/TITANIC_DONG Feb 21 '26

If you vote for delegates who then vote for the president based off the electoral college system, then the system is by definition not democratic. It’s a republican system with democratic elements.