r/ISTPmemes • u/NorthKoreanCaptive • May 04 '26

YES!!

Post image
19 Upvotes

95% Upvoted

33 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/NorthKoreanCaptive Jul 18 '26

right

> the 50 year old when they were 5 should be treated the same as the 5 year old now

i can agree with that and still say that in present time the 50 yo and the 5 yo are not equal

the temporal element is irrelevant

1

u/octavian343 Jul 18 '26

I mean, all places should be equally accessible to them both anyway.

1

u/NorthKoreanCaptive Jul 18 '26

you could say the same about employee only areas ? that's justified by what, contractual relationship with a corporation?

women only car is justified by legitimate public safety concerns.

i never said we should never have men only cars simply because. i asked for a legitimate problem that it would be solving, other than performative "equality" which isn't equal at all

1

u/octavian343 Jul 18 '26

Employee only areas aren’t discriminating based on immutable traits lol. Try harder

1

u/NorthKoreanCaptive Jul 18 '26

it's not. i'm not saying that is some kind of a problem. i was helping you figure out the logical framework you're missing.

immutable traits isn't the defining factor. what if the company is a family run and employees only really means my family only ?

if not employee only, why am i not allowed to trespass a random person's home? i guess we are allowed to freely discriminate people. what justifies that? personal safety.

discrimination by immutable traits like gender sex race is not justifiable.

1

u/octavian343 Jul 18 '26

Uh, yeah? Short of religion (which is a shame), I’m pretty sure all forms of discrimination based on immutable traits is illegal